IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v316y2025ics0360544225002452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A sustainable blockchain-based framework to develop the Li-ion second-life batteries market

Author

Listed:
  • Faria, Fábio L.F.
  • de Oliveira, Aline K.V.
  • Rüther, Ricardo

Abstract

With the growing electric vehicle (EV) market, a secondary market for reused Li-ion batteries is emerging. Second-life batteries (SLBs), which no longer meet EV performance requirements, remain valuable as they can be repurposed for stationary energy storage. However, a major challenge in the SLB market is ensuring transparency and reliability of battery performance data from their original use. This paper proposes a blockchain-based framework to address this challenge by integrating battery degradation simulations with blockchain technology. The degradation patterns of EV batteries under three different usage conditions were simulated, with the resulting data collected and stored on a blockchain. This enabled the association of usage records with battery lifetime, ensuring secure, transparent, and tamper-proof records. Our findings demonstrate that such a framework can effectively verify the health of SLBs and their suitability for reuse. Moreover, our simulation revealed good prospects for SLBs in stationary applications, as their performance could be similar to EV light use, offering a lifespan 113 % longer than heavy use and 55 % longer than moderate use. By leveraging digitalization, this solution enhances trust in SLB markets, promotes sustainable energy adoption, and helps EV manufacturers address concerns about the increasing volume of Li-ion batteries that will require disposal.

Suggested Citation

  • Faria, Fábio L.F. & de Oliveira, Aline K.V. & Rüther, Ricardo, 2025. "A sustainable blockchain-based framework to develop the Li-ion second-life batteries market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:316:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225002452
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225002452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:316:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225002452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.