IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v315y2025ics0360544224040817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calculation of CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants based on OCO-2/3 satellite observations and divergence model

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Tao
  • Xue, Yong
  • Wang, Chunbo
  • Gao, Pengyuan
  • Zhao, Bingjie
  • Zhao, Liang
  • Jin, Chunlin
  • Li, Shengwei
  • He, Botao

Abstract

The annual Global Carbon Budget projects fossil carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of 36.8 billion tons in 2023, up 1.1 % from 2022 Global fossil fuel emissions primarily result from the combustion of coal, oil and natural gas. Coal-fired power stations are responsible for more emissions than any other fossil fuel, representing approximately 41 % of global fossil CO2 emissions in 2023. The bottom-up inventory approach lacks independent third-party data validation. At the IPCC plenary, it was agreed that emission inventories based on atmospheric concentrations should be validated alongside the top-down approach. In this paper, Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2/3 (OCO2/3) observations, paired with a divergence algorithm, are employed to quantify emissions from coal-fired power plants. CO2 emissions from 28 plants worldwide using 30 cases. A comparison of these CO2 emission estimates with emission inventories yielded an R2 value of 0.73 across the 30 cases. Compared with Carbon Brief's emission inventory results, the average percentage difference of our algorithm in China is 22.15 %, while the average percentage difference of the OCO-3 Snapshot Area Mapping Observation Model (SAM) is only 6.11 %. In the U.S., the average percentage difference compared to the hourly emission inventory data EPA (the US Environmental Protection Agency) reaches 16.67 %. This result coincides with the average deviation of 15.1 % in the Gaussian plume model for the U.S. power plants. In the European thermal power plant emission estimates, the average percentage difference is about 25 % lower compared to the proxy emission values. Sensitivity tests on planetary boundary layer heights (PBLH), the derived regional background, and wind speeds suggest our divergence method is quite robust. This has been demonstrated to be a quick and effective method for estimating carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Tao & Xue, Yong & Wang, Chunbo & Gao, Pengyuan & Zhao, Bingjie & Zhao, Liang & Jin, Chunlin & Li, Shengwei & He, Botao, 2025. "Calculation of CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants based on OCO-2/3 satellite observations and divergence model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:315:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224040817
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.134303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224040817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CO2 emissions; divergence; OCO-2/3; Power plants;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:315:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224040817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.