IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v314y2025ics0360544224040404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon mitigation potential and economic benefits of biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants: A case study in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Hongkui
  • Yan, Yuting
  • Li, Zhen
  • Cao, Zhi
  • Fu, Yao
  • Zhou, Zheng
  • Zhao, Dongliang

Abstract

As a critical region marked by high energy consumption and notable carbon output, the decarbonization of the power sector in the Yangtze River Delta region is crucial for advancing China's ambitious “dual carbon” targets. This study conducts a detailed life cycle assessment to scrutinize the effectiveness and challenges associated with the implementation of biomass co-firing and monoethanolamine-based carbon capture technologies, virtually implemented at an operational coal-fired power plant in Nanjing, a significant carbon-emitting city in China's Yangtze River Delta. Four configurations have been established to assess the environmental and economic benefits of these power generation systems, under both current conditions and with selected decarburization technologies. Our findings reveal that co-firing biomass at levels of 5–20 % yields a reduction in emissions of 31–151 kg CO2/MWh, when combined with carbon capture, 20 % biomass co-firing attains net negative emissions of 38–69 kg CO2/MWh. The integration, while environmentally beneficial, escalates generation costs by 5.4–97.3 % due to biomass pricing and carbon capture retrofit expenses, presenting an economic challenge. The findings of this study can offer policymakers comprehensive compass to formulate evidence-based policies aimed at promoting the low-carbon transition of the power sector in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Hongkui & Yan, Yuting & Li, Zhen & Cao, Zhi & Fu, Yao & Zhou, Zheng & Zhao, Dongliang, 2025. "Carbon mitigation potential and economic benefits of biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants: A case study in Nanjing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:314:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224040404
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.134262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224040404
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:314:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224040404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.