IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v314y2025ics0360544224039264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on supercritical carbon dioxide cycle using air-cooler and water-cooler

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yaqin
  • Xu, Jinliang
  • Wang, Tianze

Abstract

Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) cycle has high efficiency and fast response as load changes. It is important to examine whether the sCO2 cycle is suitable in arid area. Hence, we explore the effect of air-cooler and water-cooler on the performance of a 300 MW sCO2 coal fired generation system. Flow and heat transfer models were established for air-cooler and water-cooler. The later includes shell-tube-heat-exchangers and a cooling tower. We show a 0.8 % efficiency drop using air-cooler instead of water-cooler, at an air temperature of Ta = 20 °C, which increases as Ta rises. The increased temperature of sCO2 and exergy destruction in air-cooler explain the efficiency penalty. Compared with cooling conditions for water-steam Rankine cycle, larger temperature difference exists in ∼30 K level between sCO2 and cooling fluids, explaining weaker efficiency penalty for sCO2 cycle. Besides, the usage of air-cooler creates a 3.66 million RMB cost reduction than water-cooler. The raised cost of shell-tube-heat-exchangers for the water-cooler accounts for cheaper construction of the air-cooler. Based on this study, the air-cooler induces mini efficiency drop and reduced cost, it is concluded that for sCO2 cycle it is preferable to use the air-cooler, which is benefit to save the water resource in arid area.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yaqin & Xu, Jinliang & Wang, Tianze, 2025. "Comparative study on supercritical carbon dioxide cycle using air-cooler and water-cooler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:314:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224039264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.134148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224039264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:314:y:2025:i:c:s0360544224039264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.