IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v313y2024ics0360544224037794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced dynamic modeling of regenerative CO2 transcritical power cycles: Comparative analysis of Pham-corrected and conventional turbine models

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Tao
  • Wu, Chuang
  • Li, Zhankui
  • Li, Bo

Abstract

Turbine modeling plays a critical role in assessing system power output and performance in CO₂ transcritical power cycle (CTPC) systems, particularly under dynamic operating conditions. Conventional turbine models often fail to provide accurate predictions when inlet parameters deviate from the design point, leading to discrepancies in system behavior. This paper introduces a novel methodology by integrating a Pham-based corrected turbine performance map into a regenerative CTPC dynamic system. This approach enhances turbine modeling accuracy compared to traditional models, such as the uncorrected turbine performance map, nozzle model, and empirical model. The proposed Pham-corrected model method improves system response stability, particularly in terms of inlet pressure and CO₂ mass flow rate under heat source temperature reductions, offering more reliable performance predictions. In contrast, the empirical model shows substantial deviations in net power output (32 kW or 4.0 %) and thermal efficiency (1.36 %), leading to longer system stabilization times. The Pham-corrected and uncorrected turbine performance map models exhibit similar responses under cooling water mass flow rate reductions but diverge in turbine inlet pressure trends compared to the nozzle and empirical models. Additionally, the uncorrected turbine performance map model shows significant deviations in net power (25.6 kW or 3.17 %) and thermal efficiency (0.5 %) under a 10 % reduction in pump speed. This study highlights the importance of correcting turbine inlet parameters and addressing prediction deviations in conventional models. The Pham-corrected turbine model improves reliability, performance prediction, and design optimization, especially under fluctuating heat sources. With its potential to enhance system stability and efficiency, this methodology offers significant prospects for future CTPC applications, including waste heat recovery and renewable energy integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Tao & Wu, Chuang & Li, Zhankui & Li, Bo, 2024. "Enhanced dynamic modeling of regenerative CO2 transcritical power cycles: Comparative analysis of Pham-corrected and conventional turbine models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224037794
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.134001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224037794
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224037794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.