IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v305y2024ics0360544224020231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A matheuristic applied to clustering rural properties and allocating plants for biogas generation

Author

Listed:
  • Obal, Thalita Monteiro
  • de Souza, Jovani Taveira
  • Florentino, Helenice de Oliveira
  • de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
  • Soler, Edilaine Martins

Abstract

Establishing partnerships among agro-industrial properties and selecting ideal locations for biogas plants are crucial challenges in large-scale biogas production and can influence both operational efficiency and waste management. In this context, this research proposes a new matheuristic that addresses the problems of defining a group of properties and an optimal number of groups and identifies the best allocation to the biogas plant. The group properties were defined by hierarchical and K-means cluster algorithms. The best location for the biogas plant was determined by the proposed multiobjective mathematical model. The best cluster number was decided by two strategies: (1) one that selected the closest non-dominated solutions to the ideal solution (M1) and (2) one that favored the most environmentally friendly solution (M2). The matheuristic was tested using three real databases, which yielded strategic clusters with an average daily biogas production of 544.93 m³/day (M1 and M2) for DataBase 1, 1635,156.00 m³/day (M1) and 403,497.50 m³/day (M2) for DataBase 2, and 318,662.50 m³/day (M1) and 20,479.58 m³/day (M2) for DataBase 3. This research provides an opportunity to add value to agro-industrial properties by achieving energy security and developing new business networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Obal, Thalita Monteiro & de Souza, Jovani Taveira & Florentino, Helenice de Oliveira & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos & Soler, Edilaine Martins, 2024. "A matheuristic applied to clustering rural properties and allocating plants for biogas generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:305:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224020231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224020231
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lourinho, Gonçalo & Brito, Paulo, 2015. "Assessment of biomass energy potential in a region of Portugal (Alto Alentejo)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 189-201.
    2. Fumi Harahap & Sylvain Leduc & Sennai Mesfun & Dilip Khatiwada & Florian Kraxner & Semida Silveira, 2019. "Opportunities to Optimize the Palm Oil Supply Chain in Sumatra, Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Ferreira, L.R.A. & Otto, R.B. & Silva, F.P. & De Souza, S.N.M. & De Souza, S.S. & Ando Junior, O.H., 2018. "Review of the energy potential of the residual biomass for the distributed generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 440-455.
    4. Zemo, Kahsay Haile & Termansen, Mette, 2018. "Farmers’ willingness to participate in collective biogas investment: A discrete choice experiment study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 87-101.
    5. Jianliang Wang & Yuru Yang & Yongmei Bentley & Xu Geng & Xiaojie Liu, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Bioenergy from a Global Perspective: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Obal, Thalita Monteiro & de Souza, Jovani Taveira & de Jesus, Rômulo Henrique Gomes & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos, 2023. "Biogascluster: A clustering algorithm to identify potential partnerships between agribusiness properties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 982-993.
    7. Grigoras, Gheorghe & Scarlatache, Florina, 2015. "An assessment of the renewable energy potential using a clustering based data mining method. Case study in Romania," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 416-429.
    8. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Wu, Bingqing & Paudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Modeling and optimization of a supply chain of renewable biomass and biogas: Processing plant location," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 343-355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Obal, Thalita Monteiro & de Souza, Jovani Taveira & de Jesus, Rômulo Henrique Gomes & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos, 2023. "Biogascluster: A clustering algorithm to identify potential partnerships between agribusiness properties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 982-993.
    2. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Maryam Roudneshin & Amanda Sosa, 2024. "Optimising Agricultural Waste Supply Chains for Sustainable Bioenergy Production: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Silva, D.A.L. & Filleti, R.A.P. & Musule, R. & Matheus, T.T. & Freire, F., 2022. "A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Chepeliev, Maksym & Diachuk, Oleksandr & Podolets, Roman & Trypolska, Galyna, 2021. "The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Petar Sabev Varbanov & Paweł Ocłoń & Hon Huin Chin, 2019. "Towards Efficient and Clean Process Integration: Utilisation of Renewable Resources and Energy-Saving Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Byun, Jaewon & Han, Jeehoon, 2021. "Economically feasible production of green methane from vegetable and fruit-rich food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Antonio Alberto Rodríguez Sousa & Claudia Tribaldos-Anda & Sergio A. Prats & Clarisse Brígido & José Muñoz-Rojas & Alejandro J. Rescia, 2022. "Impacts of Fertilization on Environmental Quality across a Gradient of Olive Grove Management Systems in Alentejo (Portugal)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Chidean, Mihaela I. & Caamaño, Antonio J. & Ramiro-Bargueño, Julio & Casanova-Mateo, Carlos & Salcedo-Sanz, Sancho, 2018. "Spatio-temporal analysis of wind resource in the Iberian Peninsula with data-coupled clustering," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2684-2694.
    10. Durval Maluf Filho & Suani Teixeira Coelho & Danilo Perecin, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges of Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Rong Zhao & Xiaolu Qiu & Shaozhi Chen, 2021. "Empirical Study on the Effects of Technology Training on the Forest-Related Income of Rural Poverty-Stricken Households—Based on the PSM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Singlitico, Alessandro & Goggins, Jamie & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2018. "Evaluation of the potential and geospatial distribution of waste and residues for bio-SNG production: A case study for the Republic of Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 288-301.
    13. Năstase, Gabriel & Şerban, Alexandru & Năstase, Alina Florentina & Dragomir, George & Brezeanu, Alin Ionuţ & Iordan, Nicolae Fani, 2017. "Hydropower development in Romania. A review from its beginnings to the present," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 297-312.
    14. Demel, Simona & Longo, Alberto & Mariel, Petr, 2020. "Trading off visual disamenity for renewable energy: Willingness to pay for seaweed farming for energy production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Cosette Khawaja & Rainer Janssen & Rita Mergner & Dominik Rutz & Marco Colangeli & Lorenzo Traverso & Maria Michela Morese & Manuela Hirschmugl & Carina Sobe & Alfonso Calera & David Cifuentes & Stefa, 2021. "Viability and Sustainability Assessment of Bioenergy Value Chains on Underutilised Lands in the EU and Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Sadeghi Darvazeh, Saeed & Mansoori Mooseloo, Farzaneh & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Amiri, Maghsoud & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Data-driven robust optimization to design an integrated sustainable forest biomass-to-electricity network under disjunctive uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    17. Avinash Bharti & Kunwar Paritosh & Venkata Ravibabu Mandla & Aakash Chawade & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2021. "GIS Application for the Estimation of Bioenergy Potential from Agriculture Residues: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Simioni, Taysnara & Agustini, Caroline Borges & Dettmer, Aline & Gutterres, Mariliz, 2022. "Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    19. Papagianni, Stavroula & Capellán-Pérez, Iñigo & Adam, Alexandros & Pastor, Amandine, 2024. "Review and meta-analysis of Energy Return on Investment and environmental indicators of biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Nandimandalam, Hariteja & Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2022. "Renewable wood residue sources as potential alternative for fossil fuel dominated electricity mix for regions in Mississippi: A techno-economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1105-1119.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:305:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224020231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.