IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v29y2004i7p1001-1038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical investigation of the 1995 Weatherization Assistance Program funding formula

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiser, Mark J.
  • Pulsipher, Allan G.

Abstract

The Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) is a federal block grant program established in 1976 to assist low-income households in reducing their energy bills and improve their health and safety through a variety of weatherization and related services. The manner in which WAP funding is distributed among states has been a contentious issue since the inception of the program, and in 1995, the Department of Energy developed a new allocation mechanism. The purpose of this paper is to describe the 1995 WAP funding formula and to provide an empirical analysis of alternative formulae. The central tenet of the paper is that it is not possible to define the need for weatherization assistance in a unique manner, and this ambiguity and confusion is one of the primary reasons why a distribution “formula” cannot be derived to satisfy the main stakeholder groups. The purpose of this discussion is not to “refute” or “validate” the WAP funding formula, but rather, to demonstrate the main assumptions implicit in the procedure and to point out methodological issues and the choices and trade-offs inherent in any formula development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G., 2004. "An empirical investigation of the 1995 Weatherization Assistance Program funding formula," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1001-1038.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:7:p:1001-1038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544204000131
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2004.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G., 2003. "LIHEAP reconsidered," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 1441-1458, November.
    2. Brown, Marilyn A. & Berry, Linda G., 1995. "Determinants of program effectiveness: Results of the national weatherization evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 729-743.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaiser, M.J. & Pulsipher, A.G., 2003. "A generalized modeling framework for public benefit fund program valuation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 519-538.
    2. Graff, Michelle & Pirog, Maureen, 2019. "Red tape is not so hot: Asset tests impact participation in the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 749-764.
    3. Camprubí, Lluís & Malmusi, Davide & Mehdipanah, Roshanak & Palència, Laia & Molnar, Agnes & Muntaner, Carles & Borrell, Carme, 2016. "Façade insulation retrofitting policy implementation process and its effects on health equity determinants: A realist review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 304-314.
    4. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G., 2003. "Resource allocation decision modeling for a Louisiana Public Benefit Fund program," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 639-667, November.
    5. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G. & Baumann, Robert H., 2004. "The potential economic and environmental impact of a Public Benefit Fund in Louisiana," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 191-206, January.
    6. Lauren Giandomenico & Maya Papineau & Nicholas Rivers, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Energy Efficiency Home Retrofit Evaluation Studies," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 689-708, October.
    7. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, Allan G., 2010. "Preliminary assessment of the Louisiana Home Energy Rebate Offer program using IPMVP guidelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 691-702, February.
    8. Kaiser, Mark J. & Pulsipher, A.G.Allan G., 2004. "WAP explained," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(16), pages 1843-1860, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:29:y:2004:i:7:p:1001-1038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.