IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v22y1997i4p425-435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods to estimate electric-utility transition costs

Author

Listed:
  • Hirst, Eric
  • Hadley, Stan
  • Baxter, Lester

Abstract

Estimates of transition costs for U.S. investor-owned electric utilities range from $20 to $500 billion. These potential losses are a consequence of the above-market book values for some utility-owned power plants and long-term power-purchase contracts, as well as deferred income taxes, regulatory assets, and public-policy programs. Because of the wide range of estimates and the potentially large dollar amounts involved, state and federal regulators need a clear understanding of the methods used to calculate these estimates. In addition, they may want simple methods that they can use to check the reasonableness of the estimates that utilities and other parties present in regulatory proceedings. This paper explains various methods to calculate transition costs. Top-down methods, because they use the utility as the unit of analysis, are simple to apply and to understand. However, their aggregate nature makes it difficult to determine what specific assets and liabilities affect their estimates. Bottom-up methods use the individual asset (e.g. power plant) or liability (e.g. power-purchase contract) as the unit of analysis. These methods have substantial data and computational requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirst, Eric & Hadley, Stan & Baxter, Lester, 1997. "Methods to estimate electric-utility transition costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 425-435.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:22:y:1997:i:4:p:425-435
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(96)00120-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054429600120X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(96)00120-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:22:y:1997:i:4:p:425-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.