IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v168y2019icp450-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Haoran
  • Guo, Sen
  • Zhao, Huiru

Abstract

Under the context of low-carbon economy development, the utilization of renewable energy is deemed as an effective way for energy conservation and emission reduction. Considering about the intermittent and volatile characteristics of renewable energy, the selection of the optimal energy storage system (ESS) among various kinds of alternatives is of critical significance for giving impetus to the development of renewable energy. Therefore, it is essential to develop a comprehensive assessment technique for prioritizing various battery energy storage systems and selecting the optimal one. This paper proposed an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) model combining Fuzzy-Delphi approach, the Best-Worst method (BWM), and fuzzy-cumulative prospect theory (CPT) for the comprehensive assessment of battery energy storage systems. The comprehensive assessment index system consists of 15 sub-criteria from the perspectives of technology, economy, environment, performance, and sociality based on Fuzzy-Delphi method. The optimal weights are determined by the BWM based on experts'judgments which emphasized the importance of technology and environment impacts. Fuzzy theory is employed to convert interval values and crisp values to triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) to maximize the use of objective data information, and then the CPT model is utilized to prioritize the rankings of various alternatives considering risk preferences of decision makers and investors. The empirical result shows that the Li-ion battery is the priority selection for micro-grid demonstration projects, followed by NaS battery and NiMH battery. Sensitivity analysis discusses the influences of risk preferences on alternatives rankings. Results demonstrate that even if decision makers and investors have various risk preferences, considering about the technological, environmental, economic, social, and performance criteria, the Li-ion battery is still the optimal, followed by NaS battery.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Haoran & Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2019. "Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 450-461.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:168:y:2019:i:c:p:450-461
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218323405
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zamani-Dehkordi, Payam & Shafiee, Soroush & Rakai, Logan & Knight, Andrew M. & Zareipour, Hamidreza, 2017. "Price impact assessment for large-scale merchant energy storage facilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 27-43.
    2. Hall, Peter J. & Bain, Euan J., 2008. "Energy-storage technologies and electricity generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4352-4355, December.
    3. Zhu, Wenhua H. & Zhu, Ying & Davis, Zenda & Tatarchuk, Bruce J., 2013. "Energy efficiency and capacity retention of Ni–MH batteries for storage applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 307-313.
    4. Poullikkas, Andreas, 2013. "A comparative overview of large-scale battery systems for electricity storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 778-788.
    5. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    6. Díaz-González, Francisco & Sumper, Andreas & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto, 2012. "A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2154-2171.
    7. Nojavan, Sayyad & Majidi, Majid & Esfetanaj, Naser Nourani, 2017. "An efficient cost-reliability optimization model for optimal siting and sizing of energy storage system in a microgrid in the presence of responsible load management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 89-97.
    8. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    9. Li, Jianwei & Yang, Qingqing & Robinson, Francis. & Liang, Fei & Zhang, Min & Yuan, Weijia, 2017. "Design and test of a new droop control algorithm for a SMES/battery hybrid energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1110-1122.
    10. Karellas, S. & Tzouganatos, N., 2014. "Comparison of the performance of compressed-air and hydrogen energy storage systems: Karpathos island case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 865-882.
    11. Alotto, Piergiorgio & Guarnieri, Massimo & Moro, Federico, 2014. "Redox flow batteries for the storage of renewable energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 325-335.
    12. Sebastián, R. & Peña Alzola, R., 2012. "Flywheel energy storage systems: Review and simulation for an isolated wind power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6803-6813.
    13. Zhang, Weiping & Maleki, Akbar & Rosen, Marc A. & Liu, Jingqing, 2018. "Optimization with a simulated annealing algorithm of a hybrid system for renewable energy including battery and hydrogen storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 191-207.
    14. Guney, Mukrimin Sevket & Tepe, Yalcin, 2017. "Classification and assessment of energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1187-1197.
    15. Ahlborg, Helene & Hammar, Linus, 2014. "Drivers and barriers to rural electrification in Tanzania and Mozambique – Grid-extension, off-grid, and renewable energy technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 117-124.
    16. Luthra, Sunil & Kumar, Sanjay & Garg, Dixit & Haleem, Abid, 2015. "Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 762-776.
    17. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    18. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    19. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    20. Punys, Petras & Baublys, Raimundas & Kasiulis, Egidijus & Vaisvila, Andrius & Pelikan, Bernhard & Steller, Janusz, 2013. "Assessment of renewable electricity generation by pumped storage power plants in EU Member States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 190-200.
    21. Bolund, Björn & Bernhoff, Hans & Leijon, Mats, 2007. "Flywheel energy and power storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 235-258, February.
    22. Alev Taskin Gumus & A. Yesim Yayla & Erkan Çelik & Aytac Yildiz, 2013. "A Combined Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-GRA Methodology for Hydrogen Energy Storage Method Selection in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    23. Baker, John, 2008. "New technology and possible advances in energy storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4368-4373, December.
    24. Ibrahim, H. & Ilinca, A. & Perron, J., 2008. "Energy storage systems--Characteristics and comparisons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1221-1250, June.
    25. Simone Di Zio & Mara Maretti, 2014. "Acceptability of energy sources using an integration of the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2973-2991, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Gholamreza Haseli & Reza Sheikh & Jianqiang Wang & Hana Tomaskova & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2021. "A Novel Approach for Group Decision Making Based on the Best–Worst Method (G-BWM): Application to Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Fang, Zhen, 2023. "Assessing the impact of renewable energy investment, green technology innovation, and industrialization on sustainable development: A case study of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 772-782.
    4. Kaiye Gao & Tianshi Wang & Chenjing Han & Jinhao Xie & Ye Ma & Rui Peng, 2021. "A Review of Optimization of Microgrid Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-39, May.
    5. Minaei, Foad & Minaei, Masoud & Kougias, Ioannis & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein & Hosseini, Seyed Ali, 2021. "Rural electrification in protected areas: A spatial assessment of solar photovoltaic suitability using the fuzzy best worst method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 334-345.
    6. Xiaoyang Shu & Raman Kumar & Rajeev Kumar Saha & Nikhil Dev & Željko Stević & Shubham Sharma & Mohammad Rafighi, 2023. "Sustainability Assessment of Energy Storage Technologies Based on Commercialization Viability: MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Prabha Bhola & Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Panos Kotsampopoulos & Nikos Hatziargyriou, 2023. "Business Model Selection for Community Energy Storage: A Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-30, September.
    8. Mevlut Uyan & Jarosław Janus & Ela Ertunç, 2023. "Land Use Suitability Model for Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivation Using the Best Worst Method: A Case Study from Ankara/Türkiye," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Jiang, Yinghua & Kang, Lixia & Liu, Yongzhong, 2020. "Optimal configuration of battery energy storage system with multiple types of batteries based on supply-demand characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Nan Li & Haining Zhang & Xiangcheng Zhang & Xue Ma & Sen Guo, 2020. "How to Select the Optimal Electrochemical Energy Storage Planning Program? A Hybrid MCDM Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Hui Wang & Jun Wang & Zailin Piao & Xiaofang Meng & Chao Sun & Gang Yuan & Sitong Zhu, 2020. "The Optimal Allocation and Operation of an Energy Storage System with High Penetration Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Chen, Xin & Wenjia Zhou,, 2023. "Support carbon neutrality target — Which flexible power source is the best option for China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    13. Kan Wang & Yunpeng Zhang & Li Lei & Shuai Qiu, 2021. "Evaluation on the Efficiency of LED Energy Enterprises in China by Employing the DEA Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Huibing Cheng & Shanshui Zheng & Jianghong Feng, 2022. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Ferry Operator Selection: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Gao, Jianwei & Guo, Fengjia & Li, Xiangzhen & Huang, Xin & Men, Huijuan, 2021. "Risk assessment of offshore photovoltaic projects under probabilistic linguistic environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 172-187.
    16. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Buyuan & Tao, Yao & Li, Xinying & Chu, Han & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1176-1190.
    17. Paula Donaduzzi Rigo & Graciele Rediske & Carmen Brum Rosa & Natália Gava Gastaldo & Leandro Michels & Alvaro Luiz Neuenfeldt Júnior & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, 2020. "Renewable Energy Problems: Exploring the Methods to Support the Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Meng, Jinhao & Cai, Lei & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan & Ma, Junpeng & Luo, Guangzhao & Teodorescu, Remus, 2020. "An optimized ensemble learning framework for lithium-ion Battery State of Health estimation in energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    19. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Yana Duan & Yang Sun & Yu Zhang & Xiaoqi Fan & Qinghuan Dong & Sen Guo, 2021. "Risk Evaluation of Electric Power Grid Investment in China Employing a Hybrid Novel MCDM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    21. Liu, Aijun & Zhao, Yingxue & Meng, Xiaoge & Zhang, Yan, 2020. "A three-phase fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for charging station location of the sharing electric vehicle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    22. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar, 2020. "Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    23. Huiru Zhao & Hao Lu & Xuejie Wang & Bingkang Li & Yuwei Wang & Pei Liu & Zhao Ma, 2020. "Research on Comprehensive Value of Electrical Energy Storage in CCHP Microgrid with Renewable Energy Based on Robust Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    24. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Dinesh Kumar Tripathi & Fausto Cavallaro & Pratibha Rani & Santosh K. Nigam & Abbas Mardani, 2022. "Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Systems Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Removal Effects of Criteria and the Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking Based on Compromise Solution Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    25. Yu, Yang & Wu, Shibo & Yu, Jianxing & Xu, Ya & Song, Lin & Xu, Weipeng, 2022. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore wind turbine selection: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Comprehensive Performance Assessment on Various Battery Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Zakeri, Behnam & Syri, Sanna, 2015. "Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 569-596.
    3. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Dinesh Kumar Tripathi & Fausto Cavallaro & Pratibha Rani & Santosh K. Nigam & Abbas Mardani, 2022. "Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Systems Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Removal Effects of Criteria and the Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking Based on Compromise Solution Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Argyrou, Maria C. & Christodoulides, Paul & Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2018. "Energy storage for electricity generation and related processes: Technologies appraisal and grid scale applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 804-821.
    5. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    6. Dehghani-Sanij, A.R. & Tharumalingam, E. & Dusseault, M.B. & Fraser, R., 2019. "Study of energy storage systems and environmental challenges of batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 192-208.
    7. Daniel Akinyele & Juri Belikov & Yoash Levron, 2017. "Battery Storage Technologies for Electrical Applications: Impact in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    8. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    9. Gaurav Chaudhary & Jacob J. Lamb & Odne S. Burheim & Bjørn Austbø, 2021. "Review of Energy Storage and Energy Management System Control Strategies in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Díaz-González, Francisco & Sumper, Andreas & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto, 2012. "A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2154-2171.
    11. Zhou, Zhibin & Benbouzid, Mohamed & Frédéric Charpentier, Jean & Scuiller, Franck & Tang, Tianhao, 2013. "A review of energy storage technologies for marine current energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 390-400.
    12. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Shkolnikov, E.I. & Zhuk, A.Z. & Vlaskin, M.S., 2011. "Aluminum as energy carrier: Feasibility analysis and current technologies overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4611-4623.
    14. Poullikkas, Andreas, 2013. "A comparative overview of large-scale battery systems for electricity storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 778-788.
    15. Parra, David & Swierczynski, Maciej & Stroe, Daniel I. & Norman, Stuart.A. & Abdon, Andreas & Worlitschek, Jörg & O’Doherty, Travis & Rodrigues, Lucelia & Gillott, Mark & Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Chris, 2017. "An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 730-749.
    16. Ren, Guorui & Liu, Jinfu & Wan, Jie & Guo, Yufeng & Yu, Daren, 2017. "Overview of wind power intermittency: Impacts, measurements, and mitigation solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 47-65.
    17. Caralis, George & Christakopoulos, Theofanis & Karellas, Sotirios & Gao, Zhiqiu, 2019. "Analysis of energy storage systems to exploit wind energy curtailment in Crete," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 122-139.
    18. Qaisar Abbas & Mojtaba Mirzaeian & Michael R.C. Hunt & Peter Hall & Rizwan Raza, 2020. "Current State and Future Prospects for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-41, November.
    19. Arani, A.A. Khodadoost & Karami, H. & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Hejazi, M.S.A., 2017. "Review of Flywheel Energy Storage Systems structures and applications in power systems and microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 9-18.
    20. Olabi, A.G. & Onumaegbu, C. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Ramadan, Mohamad & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Al – Alami, Abdul Hai, 2021. "Critical review of energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:168:y:2019:i:c:p:450-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.