IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v11y1986i11p1167-1180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of coal-water slurry pipeline systems

Author

Listed:
  • Bertram, Kenneth M.
  • Kaszynski, Gary M.

Abstract

Coal-water slurry pipeline systems are in various stages of development and exhibit many similarities, but they also have several unique characteristics. Existing and proposed systems range from conventional coarse- and fine-coal slurry pipeline media to the stabilized flow and coal-water mixture slurries that are under development. The roles planned for the coal being burned and the coal slurry pipeline, combined with the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative systems, tend to determine which system is most applicable for a particular use. Principal selection criteria include transport distance, water requirements, cost, and end use. Conventional coarse-coal slurries are best suited to very short-distance applications, where low water use is possible through closed-loop operation. Conventional fine-coal slurries generally require greater preparation and dewatering costs but can be transported great distances. These two systems offer excellent opportunities for rapid implementation because they have been tested on a full-scale basis. Use of the stabilized-flow system offers opportunities for domestic combustion and export because it is cheaper than coal-water mixtures. Coal-water mixtures provide the unique capability to displace oil use in oil-fired boilers. The coal-water pipeline systems for stabilized-flow and coal-water mixtures have not yet been tested on a large-scale basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertram, Kenneth M. & Kaszynski, Gary M., 1986. "A comparison of coal-water slurry pipeline systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(11), pages 1167-1180.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:11:y:1986:i:11:p:1167-1180
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(86)90054-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036054428690054X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(86)90054-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:11:y:1986:i:11:p:1167-1180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.