IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v45y2012icp54-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech–Russian energy relations

Author

Listed:
  • Binhack, Petr
  • Tichý, Lukáš

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of asymmetric energy relations between the Czech Republic and the Russian Federation. The theory of interdependence is a widely used concept in political and economic studies of international relations. As can be seen from the analysis of Czech–Russian energy relations and its costs and benefits, the interdependence cannot be limited to a situation of equal interdependence. Energy sensitivity and vulnerability of the Czech Republic towards Russia is considered as a key source of power for the energy policy of Russia vis-à-vis the Czech Republic. The evidence for this claim can be found in the procedures and expressions of Russia’s energy policy. On the other hand, the energy policy of the Czech Republic is influenced by the European Union and its focus on the liberalization of the energy market, diversification of the currently existing transportation routes and legislative proposals aimed at strengthening the EU’s own energy security. The European Union significantly contributes to an increase of the energy security of the Czech Republic. The European Union and regional cooperation (such as the V4 group) could balance out the asymmetry of interdependence, thus lowering the sensitivity and vulnerability of the Czech Republic towards Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Binhack, Petr & Tichý, Lukáš, 2012. "Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech–Russian energy relations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 54-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:45:y:2012:i:c:p:54-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512000328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Ove Eikeland, 2011. "The Third Internal Energy Market Package: New Power Relations among Member States, EU Institutions and Non‐state Actors?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 243-263, March.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:859-880 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kratochvíl, Petr & Tichý, Lukáš, 2013. "EU and Russian discourse on energy relations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 391-406.
    2. Mišík, Matúš, 2016. "On the way towards the Energy Union: Position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia towards external energy security integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 68-81.
    3. Kratochvíl, Petr & Mišík, Matúš, 2020. "Bad external actors and good nuclear energy: Media discourse on energy supplies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Ocelík, Petr & Osička, Jan, 2014. "The framing of unconventional natural gas resources in the foreign energy policy discourse of the Russian Federation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-109.
    5. Tichý, Lukáš & Dubský, Zbyněk, 2020. "Russian energy discourse on the V4 countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Dyduch, Joanna & Skorek, Artur, 2020. "Go South! Southern dimension of the V4 states’ energy policy strategies – An assessment of viability and prospects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Brigitte Horváthová & Michael Dobbins, 2019. "Organised Interests in the Energy Sector: A Comparative Study of the Influence of Interest Groups in Czechia and Hungary," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 139-151.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eckert, Sandra, 2020. "EU agencies in banking and energy between institutional and policy centralisation," SAFE Working Paper Series 278, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    2. Nina Boeger & Joseph Corkin, 2017. "Institutional Path-Dependencies in Europe's Networked Modes of Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 974-992, September.
    3. Sugimoto, Kota, 2021. "Ownership versus legal unbundling of electricity transmission network: Evidence from renewable energy investment in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Mišík, Matúš, 2016. "On the way towards the Energy Union: Position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia towards external energy security integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 68-81.
    5. Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Tulloch, Daniel J. & Ahmed, Iftekhar & McCarten, Matthew & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "An Energy Policy for ASEAN? Lessons from the EU Experience on Energy Integration, Security, and Decarbonization," ADBI Working Papers 1217, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    6. Claire Bergaentzlé, 2012. "Particularités d'adoption des compteurs intelligents au Royaume-Uni et en Allemagne : entre marchés de comptage libéralisé et règles à mettre en place pour un réel smart grid intégré," Post-Print halshs-00793322, HAL.
    7. Scarpellini, Sabina & Sanz Hernández, M. Alexia & Llera-Sastresa, Eva & Aranda, Juan A. & López Rodríguez, María Esther, 2017. "The mediating role of social workers in the implementation of regional policies targeting energy poverty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 367-375.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:45:y:2012:i:c:p:54-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.