IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v37y2009i1p254-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: An international comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Högselius, Per

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explain why the world's nuclear power countries differ from each other with respect to their spent nuclear fuel (SNF) policies. The emergence and evolution of three principal SNF approaches are analyzed: direct disposal, reprocessing and SNF export. Five broad explanatory factors are identified and discussed in relation to the observed differences in policy outcomes: military ambitions and non-proliferation, technological culture, political culture and civil society, geological conditions, and energy policy. SNF policy outcomes can generally be seen to result from a complex interaction between these broad factors, but it is also possible to discern a number of important patterns. To the extent that the five factors may undergo far-reaching changes in the future, the historical experience of how they have shaped SNF policies also give a hint of possible future directions in SNF policymaking around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Högselius, Per, 2009. "Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: An international comparison," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 254-263, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:1:p:254-263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(08)00509-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Cyranoski, 2008. "Japanese nuclear plant in quake risk," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7196), pages 704-704, June.
    2. Berkhout, Frans & Walker, William, 1991. "Spent fuel and plutonium policies in Western Europe : The non-nuclear weapon states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 553-566.
    3. Adam N. Stulberg, 2004. "The Federal Politics of Importing Spent Nuclear Fuel: Inter‐branch Bargaining and Oversight in the New Russia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 491-520.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramana, M.V., 2013. "Shifting strategies and precarious progress: Nuclear waste management in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 196-206.
    2. Laura Rodríguez-Penalonga & B. Yolanda Moratilla Soria, 2017. "A Review of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategies and the Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Wang, Qiang, 2009. "China needing a cautious approach to nuclear power strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2487-2491, July.
    4. van der Vleuten, Erik & Lagendijk, Vincent, 2010. "Interpreting transnational infrastructure vulnerability: European blackout and the historical dynamics of transnational electricity governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 2053-2062, April.
    5. van der Vleuten, Erik & Lagendijk, Vincent, 2010. "Transnational infrastructure vulnerability: The historical shaping of the 2006 European "Blackout"," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 2042-2052, April.
    6. Zhou, Yun, 2011. "China's spent nuclear fuel management: Current practices and future strategies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4360-4369, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:37:y:2009:i:1:p:254-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.