IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v33y2005i17p2191-2201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business opportunities and dynamic competition through distributed generation in primary electricity distribution networks

Author

Listed:
  • Raineri, R.
  • Rios, S.
  • Vasquez, R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Raineri, R. & Rios, S. & Vasquez, R., 2005. "Business opportunities and dynamic competition through distributed generation in primary electricity distribution networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(17), pages 2191-2201, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:33:y:2005:i:17:p:2191-2201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(04)00126-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David S. Evans & Richard Schmalensee, 2002. "Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 2, pages 1-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong, Jun & Feng, Tian-tian & Sun, Hong-xing & Cai, Hong-xin & Li, Rong & Yang, Yisheng, 2016. "Clean distributed generation in China: Policy options and international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 753-764.
    2. Blokhuis, Erik & Brouwers, Bart & van der Putten, Eric & Schaefer, Wim, 2011. "Peak loads and network investments in sustainable energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6220-6233, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gual, Jordi, 2003. "Market Definition in the Telecoms Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 3988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Giovanni B. Ramello, 2003. "Copyright and antitrust issues," Chapters, in: Wendy J. Gordon & Richard Watt (ed.), The Economics of Copyright, chapter 7, pages 118-147, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Parsheera, Smriti & Shah, Ajay & Bose, Avirup, 2017. "Competition Issues in India's Online Economy," Working Papers 17/194, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    4. Lamantia, Fabio & Pezzino, Mario & Tramontana, Fabio, 2018. "Dynamic analysis of discontinuous best response with innovation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 120-133.
    5. Lewis Evans, 2004. "The efficiency test under competition law and regulation in the small distant open economy that is New Zealand," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 241-264.
    6. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18958 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. David S. Evans & Andrei Hagiu & Richard Schmalensee, 2005. "A Survey of the Economic Role of Software Platforms in Computer-based Industries," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 51(2-3), pages 189-224.
    8. Hugo Hopenhayn & Matthew Mitchell, 2012. "Rewarding Duopoly Innovators: The Price of Exclusivity," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Jan Boone & Jacob K. Goeree, 2010. "Optimal market design," IEW - Working Papers 479, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    10. Jochen Lorentzen & Peter Møllgaard, 2006. "Competition Policy and Innovation," Chapters, in: Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), International Handbook on Industrial Policy, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Hyunjin Kim & Michael Luca, 2019. "Product Quality and Entering Through Tying: Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 596-603, February.
    12. Robert M. Hunt, 2003. "Antitrust issues in payment card networks: can they do that? should we let them?," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q2, pages 14-23.
    13. Paul M. Vaaler & Gerry McNamara, 2010. "Are Technology-Intensive Industries More Dynamically Competitive? No and Yes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 271-289, February.
    14. Joshua S. Gans, 2011. "When Is Static Analysis a Sufficient Proxy for Dynamic Considerations? Reconsidering Antitrust and Innovation," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(1), pages 55-78.
    15. Andrew Eckert & Tilman Klumpp & Xuejuan Su, 2017. "An Equilibrium Selection Theory of Monopolization," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(4), pages 1012-1037, April.
    16. Viecens, María Fernanda, 2007. "Pricing strategies in software platforms : video consoles vs. operating systems," UC3M Working papers. Economics we074823, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    17. Christophe Boucher, 2003. "“Winners take all competition”, creative destruction and stock market bubble," Finance 0305010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Prasanth Regy & Shubho Roy, 2017. "Understanding Judicial Delays in Debt Tribunals," Working Papers id:11771, eSocialSciences.
    19. Falciola, Justine & Jansen, Marion & Rollo, Valentina, 2020. "Defining firm competitiveness: A multidimensional framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Rockett, Katharine, 2010. "Property Rights and Invention," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 315-380, Elsevier.
    21. Hüschelrath, Kai, 2008. "Is it Worth all the Trouble? The Costs and Benefits of Antitrust Enforcement," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-107, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:33:y:2005:i:17:p:2191-2201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.