IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v21y1993i11p1110-1122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuing the environmental impacts of opencast coal mining in the UK : The case of the Trent Valley in North Staffordshire

Author

Listed:
  • Trigg, Andrew B.
  • Richard Dubourg, W.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Trigg, Andrew B. & Richard Dubourg, W., 1993. "Valuing the environmental impacts of opencast coal mining in the UK : The case of the Trent Valley in North Staffordshire," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(11), pages 1110-1122, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:21:y:1993:i:11:p:1110-1122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0301-4215(93)90261-D
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lavee, Doron & Bahar, Sefi, 2017. "Estimation of external effects from the quarrying sector using the hedonic pricing method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 541-549.
    2. Li, Qian & Stoeckl, Natalie & King, David, 2019. "Using the life-satisfaction approach to quantify the complex inter-related impacts of coal mining on host communities: A case study in Shanxi, China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 305-316.
    3. Isabel Mendes, 2013. "Mining Rehabilitation Planning, Mining Heritage Tourism, Benefits and Contingent Valuation," Working Papers wp032013, SOCIUS, Research Centre in Economic and Organisational Sociology at the School of Economics and Management (ISEG) of the University of Lisbon.
    4. Gillespie, Rob & Kragt, Marit E., 2012. "Accounting for Nonmarket Impacts in a Benefit-Cost Analysis of Underground Coal Mining in New South Wales, Australia," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 1-29, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:21:y:1993:i:11:p:1110-1122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.