IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v201y2025ics0301421525000588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?

Author

Listed:
  • Brunner, Christoph
  • Misconel, Steffi
  • Hauser, Philipp
  • Möst, Dominik

Abstract

Achieving a carbon-neutral power system based on renewable energy sources is a critical step toward net-zero emissions before 2050. However, weather-dependent variability of renewable energy generation necessitates various flexibility options to balance supply and demand. In addition to storage, demand-side flexibility from sector coupling (e.g., electrification of heating, transport, and industry) plays a significant role. Yet, the need for supply-side flexibility, particularly through dispatchable hydrogen power plants, remains unclear. In this context, the article addresses the following research question: How much firm capacity from hydrogen power plants is needed to ensure security of supply in a 100% renewable power system? Using a case study for Germany based on an electricity market model-based approach, this paper analyses the impact of different flexibility options on the capacity needs of hydrogen power plants. The results indicate that at least 46 GW of hydrogen power plants are required in a scenario with strong sector coupling and demand-side flexibility. A lack of flexibility options could substantially increase this capacity requirement. The analysis concludes with the policy recommendation that Germany’s current power plant strategy is only an initial step, and more substantial market incentives are essential to ensure adequate firm capacity in a carbon-neutral energy system.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunner, Christoph & Misconel, Steffi & Hauser, Philipp & Möst, Dominik, 2025. "To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000588
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000588
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.