IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v199y2025ics0301421525000321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences of future cooking fuel types among urban and peri-urban households in Greater Accra Region of Ghana: Business-as-usual or sustainable pathways?

Author

Listed:
  • Bawakyillenuo, Simon
  • Agbelie, Innocent S.K.
  • Crentsil, Aba O.
  • Danquah, Stephanie K.

Abstract

Women and children in Ghana face risks such as burns, poisoning, and injuries from using solid biomass fuels like charcoal and firewood for cooking. Although LPG is the dominant modern cooking fuel, electricity remains less commonly used. In the Greater Accra Region, 70% of households rely on LPG for cooking, while 23% and 3% use charcoal and firewood, respectively. This study examines the future cooking fuel preferences of households in Ga East, Ga West, and Adenta Municipalities, using data from 1200 urban and peri-urban households collected through a mixed-method approach. Findings reveal that LPG is expected to remain the preferred cooking fuel over the next five years, followed by charcoal, with electricity ranked third. These future preferences reflect current practices, indicating a continuation of existing trends. However, 7.3% of households expressed interest in adopting e-cooking technologies, such as Electric Pressure Cookers (EPC), if these technologies become more accessible and affordable. This suggests a potential shift toward sustainable cooking practices. To promote the adoption of e-cooking technologies, critical policy measures focused on education, affordability, and technology availability are necessary. Such initiatives could support a transition to environmentally sustainable cooking solutions in the Greater Accra Region.

Suggested Citation

  • Bawakyillenuo, Simon & Agbelie, Innocent S.K. & Crentsil, Aba O. & Danquah, Stephanie K., 2025. "Preferences of future cooking fuel types among urban and peri-urban households in Greater Accra Region of Ghana: Business-as-usual or sustainable pathways?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000321
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000321
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.