IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v199y2025ics030142152500028x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the cost savings of global solar PV and onshore wind markets

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Weidong
  • Han, Mingzhe

Abstract

Over the past decade, the capital costs of solar PV and onshore wind declined rapidly due to global markets. However, international renewable energy policies are pivoting towards national technology developments and productions. By considering the domestic components and international spillovers of experience and knowledge stock, this study develops the integrative learning curve model to investigate the mechanisms of solar PV and onshore wind technology cost developments in the United States, Germany, and China. The results show the importance of experience and knowledge spillover effects and stable public RD&D expenditures in technology cost developments. To quantify the historical and future cost savings of global solar PV and onshore wind markets, the national market scenario is defined as three countries implement nationalistic policies to reduce their dependence on global markets. By comparing estimated capital costs in global and national market scenarios, this study finds that experience and knowledge spillover effects from global markets save significant costs for three countries. Compared to China, the United States and Germany benefit relatively more from global markets due to higher unit cost savings. Finally, policy implications are proposed to guide global low-carbon energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Weidong & Han, Mingzhe, 2025. "Quantifying the cost savings of global solar PV and onshore wind markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500028x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152500028X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500028x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.