IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v198y2025ics0301421525000096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of carbon emission trading scheme policy on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Xue
  • Dong, Yu
  • Liang, Liang
  • Wei, Yuting

Abstract

The Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme (CETS), as a vital market-oriented emission reduction instrument, has the potential to influence corporate operations and investor decisions. Although the pilot CETS policy in China has been extensively investigated, its impact on information asymmetry in the stock market remains unclear. This paper aims to explore the information transmission effects of the CETS policy from multiple perspectives. Based on data from A-share listed companies, this study utilizes a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to reveal that China’s CETS policy significantly mitigates information asymmetry among the listed companies in the pilot regions. This conclusion persists even after performing various robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that: (1) the CETS policy can enhance the credibility of corporate carbon information disclosure; (2) the trading signals in the carbon market serve as an important channel for the CETS policy to alleviate information asymmetry; and (3) active government participation is crucial for the effective functioning of the CETS policy. Furthermore, our findings show that the impact of the CETS policy exhibits heterogeneity at the corporate and city levels. This study provides empirical evidence at the micro level for the construction of a nationwide CETS and the improvement of the informational environment in financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Xue & Dong, Yu & Liang, Liang & Wei, Yuting, 2025. "The impact of carbon emission trading scheme policy on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000096
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000096
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525000096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.