IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v198y2025ics0301421524005068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Zhe-Yi
  • Zhao, Lu-Tao
  • Cheng, Lei
  • Qiu, Rui-Xiang

Abstract

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has sparked widespread debate recently. As a major trading partner of the European Union, China may be significantly affected by CBAM. Therefore, evaluating the impacts of CBAM and formulating corresponding solutions is significant for China to meet its emission reduction targets and sustain economic growth. Based on the computable general equilibrium framework, we evaluate the environmental and economic consequences of CBAM from a global trade perspective, with a particular focus on its impact on China. Furthermore, we explore a potential response policy by considering whether the adverse impacts of CBAM can be offset through enhanced international cooperation and exchange in low-carbon technologies. The findings reveal that although CBAM may partially curtail international carbon leakage, its contribution to worldwide emission reductions is limited. Specifically, the CBAM's effect on China is disproportionate, resulting in a welfare cost of 231 million USD for a mere 4.39 Mt emissions reduction. In contrast, the dissemination of innovative technologies through Sino-European climate partnerships could foster a more mutually beneficial outcome. It is the critical importance of climate fairness and reciprocity in the formulation of future climate policies, and unilateral approaches to global climate governance may not deliver the intended results.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Zhe-Yi & Zhao, Lu-Tao & Cheng, Lei & Qiu, Rui-Xiang, 2025. "How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524005068
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524005068
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524005068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.