IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v198y2025ics0301421524004956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grid tariff design and peak demand shaving: A comparative tariff analysis with simulated demand response

Author

Listed:
  • Hofmann, Matthias
  • Bjarghov, Sigurd
  • Sæle, Hanne
  • Lindberg, Karen Byskov

Abstract

The electrification of the energy system requires significant grid expansion, raising the question of how to defer investments through efficient utilisation of the existing grid. Cost-reflective grid tariff designs that incentivise peak demand shaving are a possible solution. Hence, this paper compares the ability of five capacity-based and energy-based tariff designs to achieve peak demand shaving, and it provides policy recommendations on tariff choice, design options and demand response potential. The analysis is conducted on the basis of real electricity consumption data from 3608 customers in a Norwegian grid area with simulated demand response. A mathematical optimisation model that minimises customers' tariff costs calculates the response to the tariff's price signals. The results show that tariff performance depends on two design characteristics: whether the tariffs target individual or grid peaks and whether peak periods are determined ex-ante or ex-post. Further, we find that energy-based tariffs, such as time-of-use and critical peak pricing, achieve the highest peak demand reduction for load shaving, but may create new and possibly very high peaks if load shifting occurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hofmann, Matthias & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Sæle, Hanne & Lindberg, Karen Byskov, 2025. "Grid tariff design and peak demand shaving: A comparative tariff analysis with simulated demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524004956
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524004956
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524004956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.