IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v193y2024ics0301421524003161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do indicators of safeguards influence off-grid solar choices? Assessing quality, affordability, and service models in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Harrington, Elise
  • Hsu, David

Abstract

Electricity access remains out of reach for about half of the population in Sub-Saharan Africa, and in rural areas, the electricity access gap reaches almost 70%. Overcoming the electricity access gap is also spurring innovative models of distributed electrification. The considerable debate about how households will advance from off-grid solar technologies to larger appliances and grid connections has mainly focused on the economic and technological aspects of these decisions. Using a discrete choice survey experiment of rural Kenyan households, we find that quality and customer support, such as warranties, after-sale service, and local availability of appliances, are just as important or even more important than more studied techno-economic aspects, such as financing, company recognition, and technical system compatibility. These findings imply that building local capacity and mechanisms for recourse are important areas of focus for supporting off-grid solar as a means for more lasting access to electricity in rural contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Harrington, Elise & Hsu, David, 2024. "Do indicators of safeguards influence off-grid solar choices? Assessing quality, affordability, and service models in Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524003161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003161
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524003161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.