IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v186y2024ics0301421524000053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufactured housing: Energy burden outcomes from measured and simulated building performance data

Author

Listed:
  • Agee, Philip
  • Nikdel, Leila
  • McCoy, Andrew
  • Kianpour rad, Simin
  • Gao, Xinghua

Abstract

This paper reports findings from a manufactured housing development located in a mixed-humid climate zone (CZ 4 A, Virginia, USA). The research employs a multi-step case study methodology to 1) measure building air leakage in-situ in three use cases (existing, factory, enhanced) per ASTM E779 Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan Pressurization and the United States Army Corps (USACE) Building Enclosure Testing procedure, 2) evaluate energy consumption and utility cost outcomes and their impact on housing affordability using both measured and simulated electricity data, 3) propose technology mixes that achieve zero energy ready and zero energy manufactured housing to enhance affordability and reduce energy burden, 4) synthesize lessons learned for future manufactured housing policy considerations. The research found existing manufactured housing units had significant air leakage and energy use that contributed to high energy burden for low-income occupants; >6% at 30% Area Median Income (AMI). Conversely, new factory and enhanced units had lower air leakage, energy use, and energy burden (≤6% at 30% AMI). Zero energy ready (pre-solar) and zero energy manufactured housing had the lowest air leakage, energy use, and almost no energy burden (≤0.2% at 30% AMI). Findings from this work can be employed to 1) reduce energy burdens and greenhouse gas emissions in affordable housing and 2) inform the evaluation of new and existing manufactured housing (MH) policy efforts aimed at improving housing affordability.

Suggested Citation

  • Agee, Philip & Nikdel, Leila & McCoy, Andrew & Kianpour rad, Simin & Gao, Xinghua, 2024. "Manufactured housing: Energy burden outcomes from measured and simulated building performance data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000053
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.113985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.113985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clinch, J. Peter & Healy, John D., 2001. "Cost-benefit analysis of domestic energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 113-124, January.
    2. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    3. Cabeza, Luisa F. & Urge-Vorsatz, Diana & McNeil, Michael A. & Barreneche, Camila & Serrano, Susana, 2014. "Investigating greenhouse challenge from growing trends of electricity consumption through home appliances in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 188-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    2. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    3. Yushchenko, Alisa & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: How to better understand and improve from multiple stakeholder perspectives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 538-550.
    4. Rafael Herrera-Limones & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Álvaro López-Escamilla, 2019. "Solar Decathlon Latin America and Caribbean: Comfort and the Balance between Passive and Active Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Bale, Catherine S.E. & McCullen, Nicholas J. & Foxon, Timothy J. & Rucklidge, Alastair M. & Gale, William F., 2013. "Harnessing social networks for promoting adoption of energy technologies in the domestic sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 833-844.
    6. Hamza, Neveen & Gilroy, Rose, 2011. "The challenge to UK energy policy: An ageing population perspective on energy saving measures and consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 782-789, February.
    7. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    8. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2006. "Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1349-1361, October.
    9. Frilingou, Natasha & Koasidis, Konstantinos & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Nikas, Alexandros & Marinakis, Vangelis & Doukas, Haris, 2024. "Is it feasible to implement minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for existing buildings in Greece? A cost-benefit evaluation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Sanches-Pereira, Alessandro & Tudeschini, Luís Gustavo & Coelho, Suani Teixeira, 2016. "Evolution of the Brazilian residential carbon footprint based on direct energy consumption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 184-201.
    11. Jose Luiz F. Barbosa & Antonio P. Coimbra & Dan Simon & Wesley P. Calixto, 2022. "Optimization Process Applied in the Thermal and Luminous Design of High Power LED Luminaires," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Carla L. Simões & Ricardo Simoes & Ana Sofia Gonçalves & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Retno Agustarini & Yetti Heryati & Yelin Adalina & Wahyu Catur Adinugroho & Dhany Yuniati & Rizki Ary Fambayun & Gerhard Eli Sabastian & Asep Hidayat & Hesti Lestari Tata & William Ingram & Aulia Perd, 2022. "The Development of Indigofera spp. as a Source of Natural Dyes to Increase Community Incomes on Timor Island, Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Yao, Yue & Sun, Deqiang & Xu, Jin-Hua & Wang, Bin & Peng, Guohong & Sun, Bingmei, 2023. "Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery methods for mature continental heavy oil fields in China based on geology, technology and sustainability criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    15. Sumeet R. Patil & H. Christopher Frey, 2004. "Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods Based on Applications to a Food Safety Risk Assessment Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 573-585, June.
    16. Kaiser, M.J. & Pulsipher, A.G., 2003. "A generalized modeling framework for public benefit fund program valuation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 519-538.
    17. Delponte, Ilaria & Pittaluga, Ilaria & Schenone, Corrado, 2017. "Monitoring and evaluation of Sustainable Energy Action Plan: Practice and perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 9-17.
    18. Mohammad Reza KHALEGHI & Jamal GHODUSI & Hassan AHMADI, 2014. "Regional analysis using the Geomorphologic Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) method," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 25-30.
    19. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    20. Matthew Collins & John Curtis, 2017. "Value for money in energy efficiency retrofits in Ireland: grant provider and grant recipients," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(51), pages 5245-5267, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.