IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v186y2024ics0301421523005219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of transferable tax benefits on consumer intent to purchase an electric vehicle

Author

Listed:
  • Stekelberg, James
  • Vance, Thomas

Abstract

While the U.S. government has offered tax incentives to purchase electric vehicles (EVs) for many years, a new provision of the law that takes effect on January 1, 2024, will allow consumers to transfer tax credits on the purchase of qualifying EVs to the vehicle dealer at the time of sale, rather than wait to claim these credits on their tax returns filed the following year. We provide experimental evidence on the efficacy of this new tax policy in motivating EV purchases. Our results suggest that implementing a transferable tax credit mechanism increases consumer intent to purchase EVs relative to current law, consistent with the U.S. federal policy goal of shifting demand towards EVs and away from gasoline-powered vehicles. Additionally, intent to purchase increases when consumers learn about the tax policy change from the government rather than from the vehicle dealer, consistent with source credibility effects. Finally, our results suggest that the new policy may be effective at drawing new consumers into the EV market, rather than affecting consumers who were already interested in buying EVs. Our findings have important implications for policymakers as they design and communicate this and other tax incentives intended to motivate demand for sustainable products.

Suggested Citation

  • Stekelberg, James & Vance, Thomas, 2024. "The effect of transferable tax benefits on consumer intent to purchase an electric vehicle," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005219
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523005219
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Zwick, 2021. "The Costs of Corporate Tax Complexity," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 467-500, May.
    2. Ma, Hongrui & Balthasar, Felix & Tait, Nigel & Riera-Palou, Xavier & Harrison, Andrew, 2012. "A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 160-173.
    3. Kate Krause, 2000. "Tax Complexity: Problem or Opportunity?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 28(5), pages 395-414, September.
    4. Ji, Dandan & Gan, Hongcheng, 2022. "Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on below-40 young consumers’ intent to purchase an electric vehicle: A case study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Bonner, Se & Davis, Js & Jackson, Br, 1992. "Expertise In Corporate-Tax Planning - The Issue Identification Stage," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30, pages 1-28.
    6. Jenn, Alan & Lee, Jae Hyun & Hardman, Scott & Tal, Gil, 2020. "An in-depth examination of electric vehicle incentives: Consumer heterogeneity and changing response over time," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 97-109.
    7. Dumortier, Jerome & Siddiki, Saba & Carley, Sanya & Cisney, Joshua & Krause, Rachel M. & Lane, Bradley W. & Rupp, John A. & Graham, John D., 2015. "Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 71-86.
    8. Hardman, Scott & Chandan, Amrit & Tal, Gil & Turrentine, Tom, 2017. "The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles – A review of the evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1100-1111.
    9. Laura A. Wellman, 2017. "Mitigating political uncertainty," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 217-250, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xi & Wang, Ziyan & Jiang, Siming & Li, Chongyi & Guo, Huanxiu, 2024. "Financial subsidy, government audit and new transportation technology: Evidence from the new energy vehicle pilot city program in China," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Yadav, Rambalak & Yadav, Radha, 2024. "Are consumers ready to adopt electric vehicles? Analyzing the barriers and motivators associated with electric vehicle adoption in India: Policy implications for various stakeholders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Wang, Song & Shi, Lefeng, 2024. "EV diffusion promotion analysis under different charging market structure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. Wang, Xia & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "How has consumers' willingness to pay for the environmental value of new energy vehicles changed? Based on comparative surveys in 2016 and 2023," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burra, Lavan T. & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2024. "Free-ridership in subsidies for company- and private electric vehicles," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Ji, Wei, 2018. "Data-Driven Behavior Analysis and Implications in Plug-in Electric Vehicle Policy Studies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6dw4d18t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Burra, Lavan T. & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2023. "Free-Ridership in Subsidies for Company- and Private Electric Vehicles," Ruhr Economic Papers 1015, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Kacperski, Celina & Ulloa, Roberto & Klingert, Sonja & Kirpes, Benedikt & Kutzner, Florian, 2022. "Impact of incentives for greener battery electric vehicle charging – A field experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Ledna, Catherine & Muratori, Matteo & Brooker, Aaron & Wood, Eric & Greene, David, 2022. "How to support EV adoption: Tradeoffs between charging infrastructure investments and vehicle subsidies in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Yang, Jue & Zhi, Ruizhi & Galaskiewicz, Joseph, 2024. "How does policy awareness impact consumer preferences for passenger vehicles? A study from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 241-254.
    7. Hernández-Tamurejo, Álvaro & Saiz-Sepúlveda, Álvaro & Lacárcel, Francisco Javier S., 2024. "Are urban mobility policies favoring the purchase of new vehicles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Ji, Qing & Wang, Chunan & Fan, Ying, 2022. "Environmental and welfare effects of vehicle purchase tax: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Santos, Georgina & Rembalski, Sebastian, 2021. "Do electric vehicles need subsidies in the UK?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Hardman, Scott & Tal, Gil, 2021. "Discontinuance Among California’s Electric Vehicle Buyers: Why are Some Consumers Abandoning Electric Vehicles?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt11n6f4hs, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Burra, Lavan T. & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2024. "Policy complementarities in the promotion of electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. repec:eur:ejesjr:373 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    14. Ferguson, Andrew & Hu, Wei & Lam, Peter, 2022. "Political uncertainty and deal structure: Evidence from Australian mining project acquisitions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Odette M. Pinto, 2015. "Effects of Advice on Effectiveness and Efficiency of Tax Planning Tasks," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 307-329, December.
    16. David Bruner & Michael Jones & Michael McKee & Christian Vossler, 2015. "Tax Reporting Behavior: Underreporting Opportunities and Prepopulated Tax Returns," Working Papers 15-11, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    17. Nivala, Annika, 2024. "(No) Effects of Subsidizing the First Employee: Evidence of a Low Take-up Puzzle Among Firms," Working Papers 166, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Wang, Fengrong & Mbanyele, William & Muchenje, Linda, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and stock liquidity: The mitigating effect of information disclosure," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Coker, Alexander D., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 278-296.
    20. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    21. Sheykhfard, Abbas & Azmoodeh, Mohammad & Das, Subasish & Kutela, Boniphace, 2025. "Analyzing purchase intentions of used electric vehicles through consumer experiences: A structural equation modeling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 125-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:186:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.