IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v106y2017icp579-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of health benefits of mercury emission controls for China and the neighboring countries in East Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Wei
  • Zhen, Gengchong
  • Chen, Long
  • Wang, Huanhuan
  • Li, Ying
  • Ye, Xuejie
  • Tong, Yindong
  • Zhu, Yan
  • Wang, Xuejun

Abstract

Globally, coal-fired power plant (CFPP) is a major source of mercury. China is developing its first National Implementation Plan on Mercury Control, which priorities the control of emissions from CFPPs. While social benefits play an important role in designing environmental policies in China, the benefits associated with mercury control are not yet understood, mainly due to the scientific challenges to trace mercury's emissions-to-impacts path. This study evaluates the benefits of mercury reductions in China's CFPPs for China and its three neighboring countries in East Asia. Four policy scenarios are analyzed following the policies-to-impacts path, which links a global atmospheric model to health benefit analysis models to estimate the economic gains from avoided mercury-related adverse health outcomes under each scenario, and take into account key uncertainties in the path. Under the most stringent scenario, the benefits of mercury reduction by 2030 are projected to be $432 billion (95% CI: $166–941 billion), with the benefits for China and the neighboring countries accounting for 96% and 4% of the total benefits, respectively. Policy scenario analysis indicates that coal washing generates the greatest benefits in the near term, whereas upgrading air pollution control devices maximizes health benefits in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Wei & Zhen, Gengchong & Chen, Long & Wang, Huanhuan & Li, Ying & Ye, Xuejie & Tong, Yindong & Zhu, Yan & Wang, Xuejun, 2017. "Economic evaluation of health benefits of mercury emission controls for China and the neighboring countries in East Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 579-587.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:579-587
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421517302343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Qu & Guilin Han, 2020. "The Grain for Green Project May Enrich the Mercury Concentration in a Small Karst Catchment, Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:579-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.