IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v29y2007i5p999-1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk evaluation in Colombian electricity market using fuzzy logic

Author

Listed:
  • Medina, Santiago
  • Moreno, Julian

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Medina, Santiago & Moreno, Julian, 2007. "Risk evaluation in Colombian electricity market using fuzzy logic," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 999-1009, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:29:y:2007:i:5:p:999-1009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(06)00018-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossein Mombeini & Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2018. "New fuzzy logic approach for the capability assessment of renewable energy technologies: Case of Iran," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(4), pages 511-532, June.
    2. Hee-Cheon Ju & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2014. "Using the fuzzy set theory to developing an environmental impact assessment index for a thermal power plant," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 673-680, March.
    3. Moreno, Julián, 2009. "Trading strategies modeling in Colombian power market using artificial intelligence techniques," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 836-843, March.
    4. Zhai, Pei & Williams, Eric D., 2012. "Analyzing consumer acceptance of photovoltaics (PV) using fuzzy logic model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 350-357.
    5. Adiel Teixeira Almeida & Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa, 2012. "Research Developments of Group Decision and Negotiation in Latin America," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 129-132, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:29:y:2007:i:5:p:999-1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.