IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v144y2025ics0140988325002233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lubrication or ignition? The role of asymmetric oil trade in Russia's international conflicts

Author

Listed:
  • Panwang, Yuang
  • Hu, Pan

Abstract

Energy trade, especially oil, significantly impacts global economic and political stability. This paper introduces the concept of asymmetric interdependence from International Political Economics into energy economics for the first time and develops a measurement index for oil trade asymmetric interdependence. Using bilateral panel data focusing on Russia and its trade partners, we find that symmetric oil trade significantly reduces the likelihood of interstate conflicts. At the same time, lower-income countries and non-neighboring countries show more significant performance. In addition, the oil trade asymmetric interdependence does not affect the likelihood of conflict in the same way that it does in other markets, such as coal and liquefied petroleum gases. In the analysis of Panel VAR, we find that oil trade asymmetric interdependence is the granger cause of conflicts. In conclusion, we believe that, rather than using energy trade as a weapon for sanctions and international struggle, opting for more symmetrical trade is more likely to contribute to the realization of peace. We therefore call for more equitable trade relations among the nations of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Panwang, Yuang & Hu, Pan, 2025. "Lubrication or ignition? The role of asymmetric oil trade in Russia's international conflicts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002233
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002233
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:144:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325002233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.