IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v143y2025ics0140988325000520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental litigation risk premium in corporate equity financing costs

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Duan
  • Chen, Chang
  • Yao, Shujie
  • Yu, Nizhou

Abstract

The system of environmental public interest litigation is designed to address issues resulting from the lack of public interest entities in domains such as climate change and environmental quality control, which has the potential to affect resource allocation in the financial market. Based on a quasi-natural experiment from China's reform of the environmental public interest litigation system, this paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental risk on firm financing using a difference-in-differences methodology. Our research findings reveal that environmental public interest litigation significantly raises equity capital costs for highly polluting firms due to rising operational risk, environmental compliance pressure and market risk expectation. Further analysis indicates that a high ESG rating and an improved legal system help to reduce the so-called litigation risk premium. Critical empirical evidence is found to support the role of environmental judicial capacity in fostering a green development trajectory in the capital market, offering insights for the ongoing development of environmental judicial frameworks and the green transformation of China's listed firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Duan & Chen, Chang & Yao, Shujie & Yu, Nizhou, 2025. "Environmental litigation risk premium in corporate equity financing costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325000520
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000520
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325000520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.