IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v143y2025ics0140988325000374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact and transmission mechanism of China’s climate policy uncertainty on bank risk-taking

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Sijia
  • Wang, Ying
  • Liang, Yinuo
  • Fu, Rao
  • Chen, Guorong

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between China’s climate policy uncertainty (CCPU) and the risk-taking behaviors of 42 listed commercial banks in China from 2010 to 2022. The findings indicate that: (1) CCPU positively influences both active and passive risk-taking among Chinese banks, a finding that contrasts with conclusions drawn from studies employing similar methodologies but utilizing U.S. CPU. This divergence underscores the importance of context-specific analysis in understanding the nuances of CPU’s impact on bank risk-taking behavior. (2) CCPU increases active risk-taking in non-state-owned banks but decreases it in state-owned banks. Among systemically important banks, CCPU has a lesser impact on active risk-taking but a greater impact on passive risk-taking compared to non-systemically important banks. (3) Mediating analysis indicates that the return on assets acts as a masking effect between CCPU and banks’ active risk-taking, while the loan-to-deposit ratio and loan loss provision ratio exhibit partial mediating effects. The green credit ratio, however, shows no mediating effect. (4) The panel threshold effect analysis reveals that the impact of CCPU on bank risk-taking is non-linear. A higher loan-to-deposit ratio magnifies the impact of CCPU on active risk-taking, while a higher loan loss provision ratio intensifies the impact on passive risk-taking. Considering these findings, it is recommended that commercial banks, particularly non-state-owned and non-systemically important ones, vigilantly track CCPU trends and implement proactive measures to mitigate potential risks. Special effort should be directed towards improving the return on assets, reducing the loan-to-deposit ratio and the loan loss provision ratio. Concurrently, government bodies should strive to control the CCPU levels, with regulatory authorities steering commercial banks towards effective CCPU risk management and strategic preparedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Sijia & Wang, Ying & Liang, Yinuo & Fu, Rao & Chen, Guorong, 2025. "Impact and transmission mechanism of China’s climate policy uncertainty on bank risk-taking," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325000374
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000374
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Climate policy uncertainty; Bank risk-taking; Active risk; Passive risk; Systemically important banks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D25 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice: Investment, Capacity, and Financing
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325000374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.