IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v142y2025ics0140988324008715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to perceived environmental policy uncertainty with green technological innovation engagement: Evidence from a text-based measure

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Kunliang
  • Shao, Yanmin
  • Hu, Yiwen

Abstract

The literature on corporate decision-making preferences regarding green technological innovation (GTI) in the context of uncertainty remains inconclusive. As a supplement, this study focuses on perceived environmental policy uncertainty (EPU) and its impact on corporate GTI engagement. In contrast with the existing literature, which typically treats EPU as a regionally homogeneous factor without incorporating the role of how decision makers perceive it, this study proposes a text-based measure of firm-level EPU perception. This is achieved via textual analysis of board reports. In light of threat-rigidity and antifragility theories, this study posits that both adverse and beneficial effects of board EPU perception on corporate GTI participation are theoretically possible. In the context of perceived uncertainty, the threat-rigidity effect prompts decision makers to adopt a conservative stance with regard to GTI, whereas the antifragility effect has the opposite effect. The empirical findings derived from a sample comprising Chinese firms corroborate the latter argument, namely that board EPU perception has an antifragility effect, driving corporate active GTI participation. Moreover, this effect is more pronounced in firms with boards possessing stronger research and development (R&D) backgrounds, as R&D backgrounds lead boards to exhibit greater willingness to innovate and to utilise R&D resources more efficiently. This study represents an initial endeavour to offer a longitudinal indicator of firm-level EPU perception. The findings not only contribute to a more rigorous understanding of corporate eco-friendly risk-taking behaviour, but also provide insights for regulators and shareholders on the governance of corporate GTI in the context of EPU.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Kunliang & Shao, Yanmin & Hu, Yiwen, 2025. "Responding to perceived environmental policy uncertainty with green technological innovation engagement: Evidence from a text-based measure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:142:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324008715
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008715
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:142:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324008715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.