IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v141y2025ics0140988324008028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clan culture and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Xiaoyu
  • Peng, Zixiao

Abstract

Based on the Chinese context and institutional theory, we investigated how clan culture influences corporate environmental performance. Building upon existing research, we explored whether clan culture, as a potent indigenous force in China, regulates corporate environmental behavior. The findings suggest that clan culture significantly improves corporate environmental performance, while environmental regulations from the government and internal green management practices weaken this effect. After controlling for endogeneity issues and conducting robustness checks, these conclusions hold true. Further examination reveals that clan culture primarily functions through shaping moral environments and enhancing environmental awareness among top executives. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that this effect is more pronounced in companies where top executives lack green experiences and environmental disclosure is poorer. Clan culture also significantly improves corporate ESG environmental assessments and reduces corporate carbon emissions levels but negatively impacts corporate green innovation activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Xiaoyu & Peng, Zixiao, 2025. "Clan culture and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324008028
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324008028
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324008028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.