IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v141y2025ics0140988324007540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From voluntary to mandatory implementation: The impact of green credit policy on de-zombification in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Ruipeng
  • Zhu, Wenjun
  • Xu, Mengmeng
  • Zhang, Zixuan

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of the green credit policy on firm de-zombification in China using the listed firm samples. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the efficacy of two distinct policy implementation methods within the green credit policy framework. The results reveal that the implementation of the Green Credit Guidelines does not yield a statistically significant improvement in the de-zombification of green credit-restricted firms if they are implemented voluntarily. Only by including green credit performance in the assessment of bank officials, the de-zombification of such firms can be markedly promoted. Overall, the green credit policy acts as a catalyst for de-zombification by exerting dual effects: aggravating financial constraints and stimulating green innovation. The positive effect of green credit policy on de-zombification mainly comes from SOEs, firms with weak external supervision and firms located in areas with a lower degree of marketization. The results of the empirical study offer crucial insights for policymaking in China. It is imperative for the Chinese government to continue adhering to and further enhancing the green credit policy, with a particular focus on mandatory measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Ruipeng & Zhu, Wenjun & Xu, Mengmeng & Zhang, Zixuan, 2025. "From voluntary to mandatory implementation: The impact of green credit policy on de-zombification in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324007540
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007540
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324007540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.