IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v141y2025ics0140988324006911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the crisis: An empirical analysis of the NEM suspension

Author

Listed:
  • Rangarajan, Arvind
  • Svec, Jiri
  • Foley, Sean
  • Trück, Stefan

Abstract

This paper examines the suspension of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) that occurred in June 2022. Our study aims to (i) identify the key factors leading to the market suspension, (ii) investigate the behaviour of market participants and price outcomes during this period, and (iii) provide important recommendations for policy and decision-makers related to avoiding or managing crises in wholesale electricity markets. We contribute to the literature by focusing on a severe market crisis event, thoroughly examining generator bidding, dispatch and spot price dynamics over different time periods around the suspension event. Our study examines these dynamics at a high degree of granularity, presenting results at the generator fuel level and for different sub-samples, including the pre-crisis period, the built-up of the crisis, the suspension period, and after the crisis. Our empirical findings highlight that policymaking, in particular the set level of the administered price cap, as well as a lack of reliable substitutes for fossil fuel generation, were leading causes for the suspension. Further, our analysis finds limited evidence of strategic bidding on average but does not deny its possibility at granular levels. Finally, we propose policy implications based on our findings to ensure a well-functioning NEM that can facilitate a smooth energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Rangarajan, Arvind & Svec, Jiri & Foley, Sean & Trück, Stefan, 2025. "Revisiting the crisis: An empirical analysis of the NEM suspension," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324006911
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006911
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:141:y:2025:i:c:s0140988324006911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.