IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v324y2025i1p118-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination of master planning in supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Albrecht, Martin

Abstract

This paper proposes a new mechanism for coordinating master planning in a buyer–supplier supply chain. Parties take different roles in the mechanism: there is an informed party (IP) and a reporting party (RP). The mechanism consists of three steps. First, the RP defines a lump sum payment, which he will receive if a supply proposal that deviates from the default is implemented. Second, parties generate new supply proposals based on mathematical programming models. The RP communicates his profit changes for the new proposals to the IP. Third, the IP decides whether to implement one of the new proposals and to pay to the RP the lump sum minus the RP’s local profit change. We show that the mechanism is strategyproof, budget-balanced and individually rational. If the RP has uniformly distributed prior knowledge about the actual surplus from coordination, at least 3/4 of the surplus will be realized on the average. Our computational tests suggest that the coordination mechanism is effective and versatile. It identifies near optimal solutions for various master planning models and outperforms an existing approach from literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Albrecht, Martin, 2025. "Coordination of master planning in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 118-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:324:y:2025:i:1:p:118-128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725000761
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:324:y:2025:i:1:p:118-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.