IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v323y2025i3p780-794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judgmental selection of parameters for simple forecasting models

Author

Listed:
  • Petropoulos, Fotios
  • Spiliotis, Evangelos

Abstract

In an era dominated by big data and machine and deep learning solutions, judgment has still an important role to play in decision making. Behavioural operations are on the rise as judgment complements automated algorithms in many practical settings. Over the years, new and exciting uses of judgment have emerged, with some providing fresh and innovative insights on algorithmic approaches. The forecasting field, in particular, has seen judgment infiltrating in several stages of the forecasting process, such as the production of purely judgmental forecasts, judgmental revisions of formal (statistical) forecasts, and as an alternative to statistical selection between forecasting models. In this paper, we take the first steps towards exploring a neglected use of judgment in forecasting: the manual selection of the parameters for forecasting models. We focus on a simple but widely-used forecasting model, the Simple Exponential Smoothing, and, through a behavioural experiment, we investigate the performance of individuals versus algorithms in selecting optimal modelling parameters under different conditions. Our results suggest that the use of judgment on the task of parameter selection could improve forecasting accuracy. However, individuals also suffer from anchoring biases.

Suggested Citation

  • Petropoulos, Fotios & Spiliotis, Evangelos, 2025. "Judgmental selection of parameters for simple forecasting models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 780-794.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:3:p:780-794
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009767
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:3:p:780-794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.