IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v323y2025i3p724-738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fairness in repetitive scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Hermelin, Danny
  • Molter, Hendrik
  • Niedermeier, Rolf
  • Pinedo, Michael
  • Shabtay, Dvir

Abstract

Recent research found that fairness plays a key role in customer satisfaction. Therefore, many manufacturing and services industries have become aware of the need to treat customers fairly. Still, there is a huge lack of models that enable industries to make operational decisions fairly, such as a fair scheduling of the customers’ jobs. Our main aim in this research is to provide a unified framework to enable schedulers to make fair decisions in repetitive scheduling environments. For doing so, we consider a set of repetitive scheduling problems involving a set of n clients. In each out of q consecutive operational periods (e.g. days), each one of the customers submits a job for processing by an operational system. The scheduler’s aim is to provide a schedule for each of the q periods such that the quality of service (QoS) received by each of the clients will meet a certain predefined threshold. The QoS of a client may take several different forms, e.g., the number of days that the customer receives its job later than a given due date, the number of times the customer receives his preferred time slot for service, or the sum of waiting times for service. We analyze the single machine variant of the problem for several different definitions of QoS, and classify the complexity of the corresponding problems using the theories of classical and parameterized complexity. We also study the price of fairness, i.e., the loss in the system’s efficiency that results from the need to provide fair solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hermelin, Danny & Molter, Hendrik & Niedermeier, Rolf & Pinedo, Michael & Shabtay, Dvir, 2025. "Fairness in repetitive scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 724-738.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:3:p:724-738
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009949
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:3:p:724-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.