IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v323y2025i2p455-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal forecast reconciliation with time series selection

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xiaoqian
  • Hyndman, Rob J.
  • Wickramasuriya, Shanika L.

Abstract

Forecast reconciliation ensures forecasts of time series in a hierarchy adhere to aggregation constraints, enabling aligned decision making. While forecast reconciliation can enhance overall accuracy in a hierarchical or grouped structure, it can lead to worse forecasts for certain series, with the greatest gains typically seen in series that originally have poorly performing base forecasts. In practical applications, some series in a structure often produce poor base forecasts due to model misspecification or low forecastability. To mitigate their negative impact, we propose two categories of forecast reconciliation methods that incorporate automatic time series selection based on out-of-sample and in-sample information, respectively. These methods keep “poor” base forecasts unused in forming reconciled forecasts, while adjusting the weights assigned to the remaining series accordingly when generating bottom-level reconciled forecasts. Additionally, our methods ameliorate disparities stemming from varied estimators of the base forecast error covariance matrix, alleviating challenges associated with estimator selection. Empirical evaluations through two simulation studies and applications using Australian labour force and domestic tourism data demonstrate the potential of the proposed methods to exclude series with high scaled forecast errors and show promising results.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xiaoqian & Hyndman, Rob J. & Wickramasuriya, Shanika L., 2025. "Optimal forecast reconciliation with time series selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 455-470.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:2:p:455-470
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009469
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:323:y:2025:i:2:p:455-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.