IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v322y2025i2p615-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal ranking model of fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence for addressing self-confidence failure

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Chonghui
  • Luo, Dandan
  • Su, Weihua
  • Benjamin, Lev

Abstract

Fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence (FPR-SC) uses semantic self-confidence to illustrate the hesitation of experts in affirming given preference values. However, extant ranking derivation methods of FPRs-SC suffer from self-confidence failure problem. Specifically, when the logical operations of self-confidence levels are replaced by algebraic operations on semantic subscripts, the derived rankings may be unstable or independent of the self-confidence. To address this issue, an optimal ranking model of FPR-SC with chance-constrained is proposed and extended to group decision-making. Based on the concept of ‘reliability level’ in parameter estimation, the evaluation information expressed by ‘preference values + self-confidence levels’ is first explained using probability distributions to achieve dimensional unity between qualitative self-confidence and quantitative preference. A multiplicative consistency-driven optimal model is then designed to assess the individuality of self-confidence. Guided by the ‘3σ’ principle, FPR-SC is further replaced by random variables following asymmetric bilateral truncated normal distributions. This transformation captures the inner cognition of individuals during subjective judgment, and ensures effective constraints on the numerical range through the asymmetric design. Finally, motivated by the minimization of information deviation, an FPR-SC optimal ranking model with chance-constrained is constructed, and its effectiveness is verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Chonghui & Luo, Dandan & Su, Weihua & Benjamin, Lev, 2025. "Optimal ranking model of fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence for addressing self-confidence failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 615-628.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:322:y:2025:i:2:p:615-628
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724008580
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:322:y:2025:i:2:p:615-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.