IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v322y2025i2p414-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecast accuracy and inventory performance: Insights on their relationship from the M5 competition data

Author

Listed:
  • Theodorou, Evangelos
  • Spiliotis, Evangelos
  • Assimakopoulos, Vassilios

Abstract

Although it is generally accepted that more accurate forecasts contribute towards better inventory performance, this relationship may often be weak, also depending on the structural characteristics of the products being forecast, the inventory policy considered, and the underlying expenses, among others. To empirically explore the connection between forecast accuracy and key costs associated with inventory control, namely holding, ordering, and lost sales costs, we consider the data set of the M5 competition and conduct detailed simulations using popular methods to generate quantile forecasts. Our results are analyzed for various setups of the order-up-to policy and for series of different demand patterns. We find that forecast accuracy is more relevant when holding cost is similar or larger than that associated with lost sales. Therefore, in applications where the latter cost exceeds the former, the preferable forecasting method may not be the most accurate one, especially for relatively short review periods and lead times, as well as products characterized by intermittency. Based on our results we discuss some practical concerns for decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodorou, Evangelos & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2025. "Forecast accuracy and inventory performance: Insights on their relationship from the M5 competition data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 414-426.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:322:y:2025:i:2:p:414-426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009755
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.12.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:322:y:2025:i:2:p:414-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.