IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v321y2025i3p907-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic behavior in multi-criteria sorting with trust relationships-based consensus mechanism: Application in supply chain risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Fang
  • Zhang, Hengjie
  • Wang, Jigan

Abstract

Strategic behavior is common in multi-criteria sorting, where manipulated alternatives are allocated to the target category to achieve the intended goal. Engaging in such strategic behavior in sorting consensus often comes at a cost, which is closely tied to the degree of preference adjustments and the level of trust relationships among decision makers. This study investigates strategic behavior using piecewise cost-based consensus mechanism in social trust network. Firstly, the trust relationship dependent piecewise cost is formally defined and formulated by considering the impact of trust relationship on the preference adjustments willingness to achieve sorting consensus. Then, based on the trust relationship dependent piecewise cost, a preference strategic manipulation model is proposed to achieve strategic behavior in sorting consensus, which is implemented by minimizing the cost of strategically guiding decision makers in adjusting their preferences. Considering that social trust network affects strategic manipulation, a preference-network collaborative strategic manipulation model is further proposed, which is designed to strategically guide decision makers in adjusting both their preferences and social trust networks. Moreover, the practicality of proposed strategic manipulation models is exemplified through a case study on supply chain risk management and their performance is validated via simulation analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Fang & Zhang, Hengjie & Wang, Jigan, 2025. "Strategic behavior in multi-criteria sorting with trust relationships-based consensus mechanism: Application in supply chain risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 907-924.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:907-924
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724008026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:907-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.