IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v321y2025i3p760-774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain enabled traceability — An analysis of pricing and traceability effort decisions in supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Awasthy, Prakash
  • Haldar, Tanushree
  • Ghosh, Debabrata

Abstract

Despite numerous use cases, enterprise-wide implementations of blockchains have seen limited success. This raises the question of when do firms adopt blockchains and do blockchains benefit supply chains. To answer this, we examine a dyadic supply chain consisting of a buyer and a supplier and analyze their traceability effort and pricing decisions. Our results show that the demand-side, supply-side and reputational factors influencing blockchain adoption are primarily complementary and in the absence of one of them, firms can still adopt blockchain. Furthermore, even in the absence of individual benefits for a supply chain partner, there exist conditions under which blockchain adoption benefits the supply chain that can incentivize players to join blockchain. Overall, we contribute by offering a framework that supply chain players can use to assess the likelihood of blockchain implementation success or failure and address the challenges pertaining to incentives and cost imbalances in blockchain implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Awasthy, Prakash & Haldar, Tanushree & Ghosh, Debabrata, 2025. "Blockchain enabled traceability — An analysis of pricing and traceability effort decisions in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 760-774.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:760-774
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172400794X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:760-774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.