IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v321y2025i3p734-749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing the number of late jobs and total late work with step-learning

Author

Listed:
  • Phosavanh, Johnson
  • Oron, Daniel

Abstract

We study single-machine scheduling problems with step-learning, where an improvement in processing time is experienced if a job is started at, or after, a job-dependent learning-date. We consider minimizing two functions: the number of late jobs and the total late work, and we show that when at least a common due-date or common learning-date is assumed, the problem is NP-hard in the ordinary sense; however, when both are arbitrary, the problem becomes strongly NP-hard. For each of the problems where at least one of the dates is assumed to be common, we analyze the structure of an optimal job schedule with and without idle time and propose pseudo-polynomial time dynamic programming algorithms. We also show that the problem of minimizing the weighted number of late jobs with step-learning can be solved with a minor change to the algorithms for the unweighted case. In addition to this, we show that when a common due-date is assumed and no idle time is allowed, the problem of minimizing the total late work is equivalent to that of minimizing the makespan. Furthermore, we provide a more efficient algorithm to solve the problem of minimizing makespan under the assumption of a common learning-date than the one in the existing literature. Lastly, we show that our analysis can also be applied to the case of step-deterioration, where instead, the processing times of jobs increase at a given date.

Suggested Citation

  • Phosavanh, Johnson & Oron, Daniel, 2025. "Minimizing the number of late jobs and total late work with step-learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 734-749.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:734-749
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724007458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:734-749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.