IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v321y2025i3p1021-1035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new lattice approach for risk-minimization hedging under generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Junmei
  • Wang, Chen
  • Xu, Wei

Abstract

This paper explores the calculation of risk-minimization hedging strategies, specifically local and global risk minimization strategies for contingent claims under affine and non-affine GARCH models with the known closed forms of its first four moments across times under the physical measure. A unified and efficient willow tree method is introduced for various GARCH models. Unlike methods that provide option values and hedging ratios solely at the inception time, the proposed willow tree method generates a comprehensive table of option values and hedging ratios at each discrete time step across possible asset prices. Additionally, the method showcases robust performance in hedging at lower frequencies than the underlying asset’s modeling frequency (e.g., weekly or monthly hedging using a daily GARCH model). Lastly, the willow tree method outperforms the Monte Carlo method, offering greater efficiency, accuracy, and flexibility in solving risk-minimization hedging problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Junmei & Wang, Chen & Xu, Wei, 2025. "A new lattice approach for risk-minimization hedging under generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 1021-1035.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:1021-1035
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724007550
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:321:y:2025:i:3:p:1021-1035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.