IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v319y2024i1p246-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Deck of Cards Method to Build Interpretable Fuzzy Sets in Decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • García-Zamora, Diego
  • Dutta, Bapi
  • Figueira, José Rui
  • Martínez, Luis

Abstract

This paper deals with the construction of interpretable fuzzy sets by following a socio-technical-based approach, where two key actors, the (decision) analyst, and the decision-maker, interact in a co-constructive way for building a membership function that accurately represents the decision-maker’s individualized semantics, even when considering heterogeneous scales. In the proposed approach, the membership function is not provided directly but rather built from the (social) interaction of these two actors, where the technicalities of the methods are presented to the decision-maker by the analyst in a very simple way. This means that the decision-maker’s preferences will be constructed through a process in order to she/he will get more knowledge about her/his own problem. The interpretability of each membership function is now a fundamental aspect of the way the decision-maker was involved in the process. Since technical aspects are based on the Deck of Cards Method, a well-known tool for assessing the parameters of multiple criteria decision-making problems, the obtained membership functions will receive the name of DoC-MFs, from Deck of Cards-based Membership Functions. This paper also presents examples and a case study in the field of sustainability to show the applicability of the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • García-Zamora, Diego & Dutta, Bapi & Figueira, José Rui & Martínez, Luis, 2024. "The Deck of Cards Method to Build Interpretable Fuzzy Sets in Decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(1), pages 246-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:319:y:2024:i:1:p:246-262
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.06.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724005198
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.06.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:319:y:2024:i:1:p:246-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.