IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v292y2021i1p184-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing service-level contracts in sales hierarchies

Author

Listed:
  • Kloos, Konstantin

Abstract

Service-level contracts are increasingly common in the B2B relationships of manufacturers and their customers. Service-level contracts allow a certain part of demand to remain unfilled without incurring penalties, thus making allocation planning particularly difficult because the value of an allocation becomes clear only after all demands have realized. Oftentimes the hierarchical structure of sales organizations adds another level of complexity: Instead of having a central planner determining the allocations to all customers simultaneously, allocation planning must be performed decentrally along the individual levels of the sales hierarchy. We show that the resulting allocation problem is composed of two hierarchical subproblems, where the base-level problem is that of allocating supply to individual customers (customer-allocation problem—CAP), and the top-level problem is that of allocating along the individual levels of the hierarchy (hierarchy-allocation problem—HAP). We propose several new allocation approaches for the HAP and analyze their performance in an extensive numerical experiment. Our analyses suggest that with appropriate allocation approaches the performance of decentral planning can be close to that of central planning. Based on our results we also provide a useful guideline to decision makers to choose “appropriate” allocation approaches based on structural properties of the sales hierarchy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kloos, Konstantin, 2021. "Managing service-level contracts in sales hierarchies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 184-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:292:y:2021:i:1:p:184-198
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720309097
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:292:y:2021:i:1:p:184-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.