IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v281y2020i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon-constrained firm decisions: From business strategies to operations modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, P.
  • Wen, Wen

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review on carbon-constrained operations models. First, carbon constraints are defined and categorized into three genres: policy-driven, market-driven, and nature-driven. Second, business strategies for fulfilling carbon constraints are summarized and classified into three main groups: internal emissions abatement, collaborative emissions abatement, and carbon compensation. Subsequently, ten specific types of carbon-constrained operations models are studied in support of these business strategies. Lastly, the research trend is analyzed and a conceptual studying framework is proposed. The results show that the policy-driven carbon constraints are the primary carbon considerations in operations models, with the emissions trading scheme and the carbon tax taking first and second place, respectively. In addition, the focus of carbon-constrained operations models evolves from short-term to long-term strategies, from internal to collaborative abatement strategies, and from simple to more practical models. From the carbon constraint modeling perspective, future studies regarding the coexistence of multiple carbon constraints and their interactive effects might have interesting results. From the business strategy perspective, the collaborative emissions abatement models, especially horizontal co-opetition mechanisms, remain to be further explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, P. & Wen, Wen, 2020. "Carbon-constrained firm decisions: From business strategies to operations modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:281:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719302140
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:281:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.