IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v187y2008i3p1224-1237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative approach for scheduling activities to reduce set-up in multiple machine lines

Author

Listed:
  • Sherali, Hanif D.
  • Van Goubergen, Dirk
  • Van Landeghem, Hendrik

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherali, Hanif D. & Van Goubergen, Dirk & Van Landeghem, Hendrik, 2008. "A quantitative approach for scheduling activities to reduce set-up in multiple machine lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1224-1237, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:187:y:2008:i:3:p:1224-1237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(06)00833-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diaby, Moustapha, 2000. "Integrated batch size and setup reduction decisions in multi-product, dynamic manufacturing environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 219-233, October.
    2. Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 1992. "A Branch-and-Bound Procedure for the Multiple Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1803-1818, December.
    3. Selen, W. J. & Heuts, R. M. J., 1990. "Operational production planning in a chemical manufacturing environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 38-46, March.
    4. Olhager, Jan, 1993. "Manufacturing flexibility and profitability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-78, July.
    5. Sherali, Hanif D., 1982. "Equivalent weights for lexicographic multi-objective programs: Characterizations and computations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 367-379, December.
    6. Nasri, F & Paknejad, MJ, 1992. "Flexibility improvement in continuous-review (s, Q) systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 408-410, May.
    7. J. Alcaraz & C. Maroto, 2001. "A Robust Genetic Algorithm for Resource Allocation in Project Scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 83-109, February.
    8. Hanif D. Sherali & J. Cole Smith, 2001. "Improving Discrete Model Representations via Symmetry Considerations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1396-1407, October.
    9. Maimon, Oded Z. & Dar-El, Ezey M. & Carmon, Tali F., 1993. "Set-up saving schemes for printed circuit boards assembly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 177-190, October.
    10. Edstrom, Anders & Olhager, Jan, 1987. "Production-economic aspects on set-up efficiency," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-4), pages 99-106, July.
    11. Anne M. Spence & Evan L. Porteus, 1987. "Setup Reduction and Increased Effective Capacity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1291-1301, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debels, Dieter & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2006. "A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 638-653, March.
    2. Gong, Qiguo & Chen, Guohui & Zhang, Wen & Wang, Hui, 2022. "The role of humans in flexible smart factories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    3. Valls, Vicente & Ballestin, Francisco & Quintanilla, Sacramento, 2005. "Justification and RCPSP: A technique that pays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 375-386, September.
    4. Giri, B. C. & Moon, I., 2004. "Note on an economic lot scheduling problem under budgetary and capacity constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 229-234, October.
    5. Diaby, Moustapha & Cruz, Jose M. & Nsakanda, Aaron L., 2013. "Shortening cycle times in multi-product, capacitated production environments through quality level improvements and setup reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 526-535.
    6. D. Debels & M. Vanhoucke, 2005. "A Decomposition-Based Heuristic For The Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/293, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Dieter Debels & Mario Vanhoucke, 2007. "A Decomposition-Based Genetic Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 457-469, June.
    8. Bouleimen, K. & Lecocq, H., 2003. "A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 268-281, September.
    9. Proll, Les, 2007. "ILP approaches to the blockmodel problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 840-850, March.
    10. Moumene, Khaled & Ferland, Jacques A., 2009. "Activity list representation for a generalization of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 46-54, November.
    11. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Chen, Shih-Chieh, 2006. "A hybrid metaheuristic for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 707-721, December.
    12. Abdollah Arasteh, 2020. "Considering Project Management Activities for Engineering Design Groups," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Jan Böttcher & Andreas Drexl & Rainer Kolisch & Frank Salewski, 1999. "Project Scheduling Under Partially Renewable Resource Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 543-559, April.
    14. Leo Liberti & James Ostrowski, 2014. "Stabilizer-based symmetry breaking constraints for mathematical programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 183-194, October.
    15. George L. Vairaktarakis, 2003. "The Value of Resource Flexibility in the Resource-Constrained Job Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 718-732, June.
    16. Hanif D. Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2013. "An Integrated Approach for Airline Flight Selection and Timing, Fleet Assignment, and Aircraft Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 455-476, November.
    17. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    18. Dollevoet, Twan & van Essen, J. Theresia & Glorie, Kristiaan M., 2018. "Solution methods for the tray optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1070-1084.
    19. Ranjbar, Mohammad & De Reyck, Bert & Kianfar, Fereydoon, 2009. "A hybrid scatter search for the discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 35-48, February.
    20. White, Richard E. & Prybutok, Victor, 2001. "The relationship between JIT practices and type of production system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 113-124, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:187:y:2008:i:3:p:1224-1237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.