IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v31y2024icp81-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentially Private Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Continuous Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Kwak, Seung Woo
  • Ahn, Jeongyoun
  • Lee, Jaewoo
  • Park, Cheolwoo

Abstract

Data privacy is a growing concern in modern data analyses as more and more types of information about individuals are collected and shared. Statistical analysis in consideration of privacy is thus becoming an exciting area of research. Differential privacy can provide a means by which one can measure the stochastic risk of violating the privacy of individuals that can result from conducting an analysis, such as a simple query from a database and a hypothesis test. The main interest of the work is a goodness-of-fit test that compares the sampled data to a known distribution. Many differentially private goodness-of-fit tests have been proposed for discrete random variables, but little work has been done for continuous variables. The objective is to review some existing tests that guarantee differential privacy for discrete random variables, and to propose an extension to continuous cases via a discretization process. The proposed test procedures are demonstrated through simulated examples and applied to the Household Financial Welfare Survey of South Korea in 2018.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwak, Seung Woo & Ahn, Jeongyoun & Lee, Jaewoo & Park, Cheolwoo, 2024. "Differentially Private Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Continuous Variables," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 81-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:31:y:2024:i:c:p:81-99
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.09.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306221001143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:31:y:2024:i:c:p:81-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.