IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v71y2025ics221204162400086x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Watershed’s spatial targeting: Enhancing payments for ecosystem services to scale up agroecosystem restoration through nature-based solutions

Author

Listed:
  • de Mendonça, Gislaine Costa
  • Abdo, Maria Teresa Vilela Nogueira
  • da Costa, Luis Miguel
  • Costa, Renata Cristina Araújo
  • Pacheco, Fernando António Leal
  • Ribeiro, Milton Cezar
  • Zakia, Maria José Brito
  • Borma, Laura De Simone
  • Pissarra, Teresa Cristina Tarlé

Abstract

Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) globally addresses land use-tenure-restoration tradeoffs. The Atlantic Forest Connection Projetc, a Brazilian collaborative initiative, aimed to preserve and restore the Brazilian Atlantic Forest fostering and rewarding sustainable land use that could generate biodiversity, climate, and socioeconomic benefits through Nature-based Solutions (NbS). However, comprehensive assessments of these strategic implementations are still lacking. To validate them and enhance overall effectiveness, we have developed the PES-Catchment protocol, a watershed-based framework that targets strategic areas, and propose metrics for evaluating water and soil conservation services. This methodology seeks to optimize the impact of existing environmental and socioeconomic public policies and governance, by directing the efficient implementation of NbS in the restoration of agroecosystems. Priority areas were identified using a multicriteria decision analysis in GIS software, by merging key factors (watershed management, landscape vulnerability, water availability, land degradation) for improving landscape restoration and ecosystem services through agroforestry implementation. Three reference scenarios were created to identify where the benefits can be maximized: SI) multiple ecosystem services conservation (water and soil); SII) hydrological services provision; and SIII) land degradation neutrality. The extent of high levels of degradation across scenarios ranges from 22 to 26%, with scenario SI being the most responsive to high-priority areas. In contrast, low priority areas were more frequently observed under SII scenario, followed by SIII and SI, respectively. The projections prioritized 25% of the area along the most critical catchments and subbasins, exposing a significant level of land degradation and risks to hydrological services. Furthermore, around 50% of the private rural properties registered in the programs are distributed in medium priority areas, and 21% on average are in high-priority areas, which represents an alert to redirect targets and intensify the efforts in resource allocation (implementing/monitoring). The PES – Catchment outcomes offer insights and structural support to adjust governance strategies, optimizing payments for ecosystem services aimed at landscape restoration and watershed conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • de Mendonça, Gislaine Costa & Abdo, Maria Teresa Vilela Nogueira & da Costa, Luis Miguel & Costa, Renata Cristina Araújo & Pacheco, Fernando António Leal & Ribeiro, Milton Cezar & Zakia, Maria José Br, 2025. "Watershed’s spatial targeting: Enhancing payments for ecosystem services to scale up agroecosystem restoration through nature-based solutions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:71:y:2025:i:c:s221204162400086x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221204162400086X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:71:y:2025:i:c:s221204162400086x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.