IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v70y2024ics2212041624000809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands

Author

Listed:
  • Wood, Kevin A.
  • Jupe, Lucy L.
  • Aguiar, Francisca C.
  • Collins, Alexandra M.
  • Davidson, Scott J.
  • Freeman, Will
  • Kirkpatrick, Liam
  • Lobato-de Magalhães, Tatiana
  • McKinley, Emma
  • Nuno, Ana
  • Pagès, Jordi F.
  • Petruzzella, Antonella
  • Pritchard, Dave
  • Reeves, Jonathan P.
  • Thomaz, Sidinei Magela
  • Thornton, Sara A.
  • Yamashita, Hiromi
  • Newth, Julia L.

Abstract

Wetlands make a disproportionately large contribution to global biodiversity and provide critical ecosystem services for humanity. Yet, our understanding of the cultural ecosystem services (CES) provided by wetlands remains limited, with benefits often only recognised at local scales. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of wetland CES. Our synthesis addressed key questions related to the provision of CES by different types of wetlands, their economic value, their co-occurrence and associations with other ecosystem services, threats to the provision of CES by wetlands, as well as the availability and use of CES information. Based on 861 published papers (1968–2022) in 17 languages, we found evidence of CES provided by wetlands in 175 countries and territories, highlighting that wetlands are globally important for the provision of CES. Recreation/tourism was the most frequently reported CES (40 %), with cultural identity/heritage (16 %) and education/learning/knowledge (13 %) also well-represented. In contrast, examples of sense of place (4 %) and bequest (4 %) were least frequent. Our synthesis of published estimates yielded a mean of £57262 ha−1 yr−1 for the cultural benefits of wetlands; however, this mean should be interpreted with caution given that we documented a very wide range of estimates for each CES type of <£1–£1065205 ha−1 yr−1. Threats to wetland CES were documented in 45 % of papers, and included wetland destruction, pollution, and climate change. The probability that a CES paper would be available open access, and the probability that a published paper featured at least one author affiliated with the country where the study was conducted, both varied significantly among continents and publication years. Conservation outcomes related to CES featured in 13 % of papers, whilst 10 % made policy/management recommendations. Our study highlights the links between wetlands and human culture, emphasising their importance in motivating future wetland creation and restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Wood, Kevin A. & Jupe, Lucy L. & Aguiar, Francisca C. & Collins, Alexandra M. & Davidson, Scott J. & Freeman, Will & Kirkpatrick, Liam & Lobato-de Magalhães, Tatiana & McKinley, Emma & Nuno, Ana & Pag, 2024. "A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:70:y:2024:i:c:s2212041624000809
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000809
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:70:y:2024:i:c:s2212041624000809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.