IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v63y2023ics2212041623000499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating local and ecological knowledge to assess the benefits of trees for ecosystem services: A holistic process-based methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Messina, Tainan
  • Figueira, Rui
  • Santos, José M.L.

Abstract

Management decisions in agriculture regarding landscape structure, biodiversity conservation, food production, climate adaptation and other planetary issues need to be supported by sound data and innovative solutions. The food system can and must become a part of the solution, particularly if it integrates nature-based solutions promoting biodiversity as services, such as pest control provided by local birds. Birds have been shown to contribute to invertebrates’ predation and pest control, among many ecosystem services, in agricultural landscapes, especially where trees are present. Trees are also services providers and can contribute to ecosystem regulation, shelter and foraging of species, among other important contributions. In this study, we developed a methodology that integrates species, trait, and crop data; pest predation indicators and local farmers’ expertise, to determine the consumption of pests by birds, in intensive farming systems of Central Portugal. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between birds and service provision over a tree gradient, at the landscape level. For that, we used point count data to estimate the daily consumption of invertebrates by birds, based on energy requirements and life cycle characteristics of each species. Using species guilds, we related habitat requirements to pest control services, which showed higher predation in annual crops close to trees or woody vegetation compared to the ones with just crops. Further, we analysed the methodology’s main challenges and strengths. Lastly, we concluded that the holistic characteristic of the developed process would guide stakeholders and policy’ elaboration more effectively, as we have learnt that farmers’ participation enabled more accurate analysis and results and could bring them closer to the research process.

Suggested Citation

  • Messina, Tainan & Figueira, Rui & Santos, José M.L., 2023. "Integrating local and ecological knowledge to assess the benefits of trees for ecosystem services: A holistic process-based methodology," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:63:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000499
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000499
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaglio, M. & Aschonitis, V. & Pieretti, L. & Santos, L. & Gissi, E. & Castaldelli, G. & Fano, E.A., 2019. "Modelling past, present and future Ecosystem Services supply in a protected floodplain under land use and climate changes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 23-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Ouyang & Zhenbo Wang & Xiang Zhu, 2019. "Construction of the Ecological Security Pattern of Urban Agglomeration under the Framework of Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services Using Bayesian Network Machine Learning: Case Study of the Changsh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Feiyan Chen & Ling Li & Jiqiang Niu & Aiwen Lin & Shiyu Chen & Lin Hao, 2019. "Evaluating Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Dynamics and Ecological Zoning Management in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Gaglio, Mattias & Aschonitis, Vassilis & Castaldelli, Giuseppe & Fano, Elisa Anna, 2020. "Land use intensification rather than land cover change affects regulating services in the mountainous Adige river basin (Italy)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    4. Ávila-García, Daniela & Morató, Jordi & Pérez-Maussán, Ana I. & Santillán-Carvantes, Patricia & Alvarado, Jannice & Comín, Francisco A., 2020. "Impacts of alternative land-use policies on water ecosystem services in the Río Grande de Comitán-Lagos de Montebello watershed, Mexico," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    5. Teresa Pinto-Correia & José Muñoz-Rojas & Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Egon Bjørnshave Noe, 2019. "Governance Discourses Reflecting Tensions in a Multifunctional Land Use System in Decay; Tradition Versus Modernity in the Portuguese Montado," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Yanan Zhang & Ri Jin & Weihong Zhu & Da Zhang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2020. "Impacts of Land Use Changes on Wetland Ecosystem Services in the Tumen River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:63:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.